Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max wins on 0/0 benchmarks
Not enough overlapping benchmarks to declare a winner yet · GPT-5.1-Codex-Max · Llama 3.3 70B Instruct are still filling in scores.
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
#10 by perf·no signal
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
#107 by perf·no signal
Best value
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
17.4x better value than GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
12.8 pts/$
$5.63/M
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
223.3 pts/$
$0.21/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Meta AI
$1.50T·Tier 1
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1.25 | $10.00 | 400K tokens (~200 books) | $34.38 | |
| $0.10 | $0.32 | 131K tokens (~66 books) | $1.55 |
People also compared
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max vs GPT-5 ChatClaude Mythos Preview vs GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxGPT-5.1-Codex-Max vs Qwen3.5 397B A17BDeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxClaude Instant vs GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxGPT-5.1-Codex-Max vs Step 3.5 FlashDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxGPT-5.1-Codex-Max vs MiMo-V2-Flash