Compare · ModelsLive · 3 picked · head to head
Claude 2 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) vs GPT-4 Turbo
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GPT-4 Turbo wins on 10/14 benchmarks
GPT-4 Turbo wins 10 of 14 shared benchmarks. Leads in general · math · reasoning.
Category leads
general·GPT-4 Turboknowledge·Claude 2math·GPT-4 Turboreasoning·GPT-4 Turbocoding·GPT-4 Turbo
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Claude 2
#229 by perf·no signal
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
#235 by perf·no signal
GPT-4 Turbo
#197 by perf·no signal
Best value
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
11.2x better value than GPT-4 Turbo
Claude 2
n/a
no price
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
21.9 pts/$
$1.50/M
GPT-4 Turbo
1.9 pts/$
$20.00/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Anthropic
$965.0B·Tier 1
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
14 benchmarks · 3 models
Claude 2GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4 Turbo
Dtbench
GPT-4 Turbo leads by +18.0
Claude 2
19.8
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
14.2
GPT-4 Turbo
37.8
GPQA diamond
Claude 2 leads by +5.4
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Claude 2
12.9
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
2.9
GPT-4 Turbo
7.5
MATH level 5
GPT-4 Turbo leads by +11.2
MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics.
Claude 2
11.7
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
11.6
GPT-4 Turbo
23.0
MMLU
GPT-4 Turbo leads by +5.2
Massive Multitask Language Understanding · 57 subjects spanning STEM, humanities, social sciences, and more. The standard benchmark for broad knowledge.
Claude 2
71.3
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
56.4
GPT-4 Turbo
76.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Claude 2 leads by +0.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Claude 2
2.4
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
2.1
GPT-4 Turbo
1.0
TriviaQA
Claude 2 leads by +1.7
TriviaQA · reading comprehension benchmark with trivia questions, requiring models to find and reason over evidence from provided documents.
Claude 2
87.5
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
85.8
GPT-4 Turbo
84.8
BBH
GPT-4 Turbo leads by +18.0
BIG-Bench Hard · a curated subset of 23 challenging tasks from BIG-Bench where language models previously failed to outperform average humans.
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
48.8
GPT-4 Turbo
66.8
Chess Puzzles
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
0.0
GPT-4 Turbo
0.0
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
GPT-4 Turbo leads by +0.7
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
0.0
GPT-4 Turbo
0.7
GSM8K
GPT-4 Turbo leads by +32.2
Grade School Math 8K · 8,500 linguistically diverse grade-school math word problems that require multi-step reasoning to solve.
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
57.8
GPT-4 Turbo
90.0
Lmca
GPT-4 Turbo leads by +8.7
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
11.3
GPT-4 Turbo
20.1
Mystery Game Puzzles
GPT-4 Turbo leads by +3.1
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
0.0
GPT-4 Turbo
3.1
WeirdML
GPT-4 Turbo leads by +8.9
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
3.5
GPT-4 Turbo
12.4
Winogrande
GPT-4 Turbo leads by +11.8
WinoGrande · large-scale commonsense reasoning benchmark where models must resolve ambiguous pronouns in carefully constructed sentence pairs.
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
63.2
GPT-4 Turbo
75.0
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|---|
Dtbench | 19.8 | 14.2 | 37.8 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 12.9 | 2.9 | 7.5 |
MATH level 5 MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics. | 11.7 | 11.6 | 23.0 |
MMLU Massive Multitask Language Understanding · 57 subjects spanning STEM, humanities, social sciences, and more. The standard benchmark for broad knowledge. | 71.3 | 56.4 | 76.5 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.0 |
TriviaQA TriviaQA · reading comprehension benchmark with trivia questions, requiring models to find and reason over evidence from provided documents. | 87.5 | 85.8 | 84.8 |
BBH BIG-Bench Hard · a curated subset of 23 challenging tasks from BIG-Bench where language models previously failed to outperform average humans. | — | 48.8 | 66.8 |
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities. | — | 0.0 | 0.0 |
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private | — | 0.0 | 0.7 |
GSM8K Grade School Math 8K · 8,500 linguistically diverse grade-school math word problems that require multi-step reasoning to solve. | — | 57.8 | 90.0 |
Lmca | — | 11.3 | 20.1 |
Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 0.0 | 3.1 |
WeirdML WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns. | — | 3.5 | 12.4 |
Winogrande WinoGrande · large-scale commonsense reasoning benchmark where models must resolve ambiguous pronouns in carefully constructed sentence pairs. | — | 63.2 | 75.0 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | |
| $1.00 | $2.00 | 4K tokens (~2 books) | $12.50 | |
| $10.00 | $30.00 | 128K tokens (~64 books) | $150.00 |