Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Claude Fable 5.2 wins on 6/8 benchmarks
Claude Fable 5.2 wins 6 of 8 shared benchmarks. Leads in knowledge · math · general.
Category leads
knowledge·Claude Fable 5.2math·Claude Fable 5.2general·Claude Fable 5.2
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Claude Fable 5.2
#1 by perf·#6 by attention
Kimi K3.1 Pro
#29 by perf·#15 by attention
Best value
Kimi K3.1 Pro
3.2x better value than Claude Fable 5.2
Claude Fable 5.2
3.6 pts/$
$24.00/M
Kimi K3.1 Pro
11.3 pts/$
$6.00/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Anthropic
$965.0B·Tier 1
Moonshot AI
$50.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
8 benchmarks · 2 models
Claude Fable 5.2Kimi K3.1 Pro
Chess Puzzles
Claude Fable 5.2 leads by +35.8
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
Claude Fable 5.2
77.9
Kimi K3.1 Pro
42.1
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
Claude Fable 5.2 leads by +34.2
Claude Fable 5.2
100.0
Kimi K3.1 Pro
65.8
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
Claude Fable 5.2 leads by +17.6
Claude Fable 5.2
100.0
Kimi K3.1 Pro
82.4
Furniture Assembly
Claude Fable 5.2 leads by +48.8
Claude Fable 5.2
85.7
Kimi K3.1 Pro
36.9
GPQA diamond
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads by +0.4
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Claude Fable 5.2
95.7
Kimi K3.1 Pro
96.1
Mystery Game Puzzles
Claude Fable 5.2 leads by +52.9
Claude Fable 5.2
89.0
Kimi K3.1 Pro
36.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads by +0.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Claude Fable 5.2
99.7
Kimi K3.1 Pro
100.0
SimpleQA Verified
Claude Fable 5.2 leads by +31.8
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
Claude Fable 5.2
94.0
Kimi K3.1 Pro
62.2
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.2 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities. | 77.9 | 42.1 |
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private | 100.0 | 65.8 |
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private | 100.0 | 82.4 |
Furniture Assembly | 85.7 | 36.9 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 95.7 | 96.1 |
Mystery Game Puzzles | 89.0 | 36.1 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 99.7 | 100.0 |
SimpleQA Verified SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information. | 94.0 | 62.2 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $8.00 | $40.00 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $160.00 | |
| $2.00 | $10.00 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $40.00 |
People also compared