Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Claude Fable 5 wins on 3/3 benchmarks
Claude Fable 5 wins 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed.
Category leads
speed·Claude Fable 5
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Claude Fable 5
#12 by perf·no signal
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
#6 by perf·#5 by attention
Best value
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
39.4x better value than Claude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5
2.5 pts/$
$30.00/M
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
97.8 pts/$
$0.80/M
Vendor risk
Mixed exposure
One or more vendors flagged
Anthropic
$380.0B·Tier 1
DeepSeek
$3.4B·Tier 1
Head to head
3 benchmarks · 2 models
Claude Fable 5DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
Claude Fable 5 leads by +52.8
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
Claude Fable 5
52.8
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
0.0
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
Claude Fable 5 leads by +38.6
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
Claude Fable 5
76.5
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
37.9
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
Claude Fable 5 leads by +30.4
Claude Fable 5
59.9
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
29.4
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale |
|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?" | 52.8 | 0.0 |
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads. | 76.5 | 37.9 |
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 59.9 | 29.4 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $10.00 | $50.00 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $200.00 | |
| $0.40 | $1.20 | 164K tokens (~82 books) | $6.00 |