Compare · ModelsLive · 3 picked · head to head
Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-6 Astra
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GPT-6 Astra wins on 23/37 benchmarks
GPT-6 Astra wins 23 of 37 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed · agentic · knowledge.
Category leads
speed·GPT-6 Astraagentic·GPT-6 Astrareasoning·Claude Fable 5knowledge·GPT-6 Astracoding·GPT-6 Astrageneral·GPT-6 Astramath·GPT-6 Astraarena·Claude Fable 5
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Claude Fable 5
#27 by perf·#12 by attention
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
#137 by perf·#5 by attention
GPT-6 Astra
#9 by perf·#1 by attention
Best value
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
2.7x better value than GPT-6 Astra
Claude Fable 5
2.3 pts/$
$30.00/M
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
6.9 pts/$
$7.00/M
GPT-6 Astra
2.6 pts/$
$30.00/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Anthropic
$965.0B·Tier 1
Google DeepMind
$4.20T·Tier 1
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
37 benchmarks · 3 models
Claude Fable 5Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-6 Astra
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
Claude Fable 5 leads by +7.2
Claude Fable 5
59.9
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
29.7
GPT-6 Astra
52.7
APEX-Agents
GPT-6 Astra leads by +1.1
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
Claude Fable 5
63.6
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
35.3
GPT-6 Astra
64.7
ARC-AGI
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
Claude Fable 5
98.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
98.0
GPT-6 Astra
98.5
ARC-AGI-2
GPT-6 Astra leads by +5.8
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
Claude Fable 5
89.2
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
77.1
GPT-6 Astra
95.0
Chess Puzzles
GPT-6 Astra leads by +17.9
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
Claude Fable 5
37.9
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
52.6
GPT-6 Astra
70.5
Deepswe
GPT-6 Astra leads by +4.2
Claude Fable 5
69.9
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
11.7
GPT-6 Astra
74.1
Dtbench
Claude Fable 5 leads by +1.8
Claude Fable 5
97.3
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
95.1
GPT-6 Astra
95.5
Ebr Bench
GPT-6 Astra leads by +36.7
Claude Fable 5
39.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
14.3
GPT-6 Astra
76.2
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
GPT-6 Astra leads by +7.4
Claude Fable 5
90.2
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
26.8
GPT-6 Astra
97.6
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
GPT-6 Astra leads by +6.7
Claude Fable 5
87.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
59.6
GPT-6 Astra
93.7
Furniture Assembly
GPT-6 Astra leads by +63.1
Claude Fable 5
8.3
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
0.0
GPT-6 Astra
71.4
GPQA diamond
GPT-6 Astra leads by +1.8
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Claude Fable 5
81.1
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
92.6
GPT-6 Astra
94.4
Lmca
GPT-6 Astra leads by +3.8
Claude Fable 5
71.9
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
63.3
GPT-6 Astra
75.7
Mirrorcode
Claude Fable 5 leads by +17.2
Claude Fable 5
63.9
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
8.9
GPT-6 Astra
46.7
Mystery Game Puzzles
GPT-6 Astra leads by +35.3
Claude Fable 5
47.1
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
27.3
GPT-6 Astra
82.4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Claude Fable 5
100.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
95.6
GPT-6 Astra
100.0
Proofbench
GPT-6 Astra leads by +4.0
Claude Fable 5
95.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
26.0
GPT-6 Astra
99.0
SimpleQA Verified
GPT-6 Astra leads by +2.1
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
Claude Fable 5
70.7
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
73.5
GPT-6 Astra
75.6
WeirdML
GPT-6 Astra leads by +1.6
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
Claude Fable 5
91.9
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
72.1
GPT-6 Astra
93.6
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
Claude Fable 5 leads by +31.4
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
Claude Fable 5
52.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
21.4
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
Claude Fable 5 leads by +7.7
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
Claude Fable 5
76.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
68.8
Artificial Analysis · CritPt
GPT-6 Astra leads by +14.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
17.7
GPT-6 Astra
31.7
Artificial Analysis · GDPval
GPT-6 Astra leads by +38.3
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
13.8
GPT-6 Astra
52.1
Artificial Analysis · GPQA Diamond
GPT-6 Astra leads by +2.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
94.1
GPT-6 Astra
96.1
Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam
GPT-6 Astra leads by +7.7
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
47.0
GPT-6 Astra
54.7
Artificial Analysis · Long Context Reasoning
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +1.3
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
82.0
GPT-6 Astra
80.7
Artificial Analysis · MMMU Pro
GPT-6 Astra leads by +4.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
82.4
GPT-6 Astra
86.9
Artificial Analysis · SciCode
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +2.2
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
58.7
GPT-6 Astra
56.5
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
Claude Fable 5 leads by +207.7
Claude Fable 5
1653.9
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
1446.2
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
Claude Fable 5 leads by +20.6
Claude Fable 5
1507.6
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
1487.0
Balrog
GPT-6 Astra leads by +11.3
Balrog · benchmarks AI agents on text-based adventure games, testing language understanding, strategic planning, and long-horizon reasoning.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
57.0
GPT-6 Astra
68.3
Frontiercode
Claude Fable 5 leads by +0.2
Claude Fable 5
53.5
GPT-6 Astra
53.3
Frontierswe
GPT-6 Astra leads by +18.6
Claude Fable 5
47.0
GPT-6 Astra
65.5
HLE
GPT-6 Astra leads by +8.8
HLE (Humanity's Last Exam) · a reasoning benchmark designed to be the hardest public evaluation of AI. Questions span mathematics, physics, philosophy, and logic · curated to be at or beyond the frontier of human expert capability. Tested with and without tool augmentation. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 46.9% without tools and 54.7% with tools · making it one of the few benchmarks where the top score is below 60%.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
43.7
GPT-6 Astra
52.5
PostTrainBench
Claude Fable 5 leads by +19.8
Claude Fable 5
41.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
22.0
Remote Labor Index
GPT-6 Astra leads by +4.7
Claude Fable 5
16.1
GPT-6 Astra
20.8
SimpleBench
Claude Fable 5 leads by +2.8
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
Claude Fable 5
78.3
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
75.5
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 59.9 | 29.7 | 52.7 |
APEX-Agents APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments. | 63.6 | 35.3 | 64.7 |
ARC-AGI ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization. | 98.5 | 98.0 | 98.5 |
ARC-AGI-2 ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data. | 89.2 | 77.1 | 95.0 |
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities. | 37.9 | 52.6 | 70.5 |
Deepswe | 69.9 | 11.7 | 74.1 |
Dtbench | 97.3 | 95.1 | 95.5 |
Ebr Bench | 39.5 | 14.3 | 76.2 |
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private | 90.2 | 26.8 | 97.6 |
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private | 87.0 | 59.6 | 93.7 |
Furniture Assembly | 8.3 | 0.0 | 71.4 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 81.1 | 92.6 | 94.4 |
Lmca | 71.9 | 63.3 | 75.7 |
Mirrorcode | 63.9 | 8.9 | 46.7 |
Mystery Game Puzzles | 47.1 | 27.3 | 82.4 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 100.0 | 95.6 | 100.0 |
Proofbench | 95.0 | 26.0 | 99.0 |
SimpleQA Verified SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information. | 70.7 | 73.5 | 75.6 |
WeirdML WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns. | 91.9 | 72.1 | 93.6 |
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?" | 52.8 | 21.4 | — |
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads. | 76.5 | 68.8 | — |
Artificial Analysis · CritPt | — | 17.7 | 31.7 |
Artificial Analysis · GDPval | — | 13.8 | 52.1 |
Artificial Analysis · GPQA Diamond | — | 94.1 | 96.1 |
Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam | — | 47.0 | 54.7 |
Artificial Analysis · Long Context Reasoning | — | 82.0 | 80.7 |
Artificial Analysis · MMMU Pro | — | 82.4 | 86.9 |
Artificial Analysis · SciCode | — | 58.7 | 56.5 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding | 1653.9 | 1446.2 | — |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall | 1507.6 | 1487.0 | — |
Balrog Balrog · benchmarks AI agents on text-based adventure games, testing language understanding, strategic planning, and long-horizon reasoning. | — | 57.0 | 68.3 |
Frontiercode | 53.5 | — | 53.3 |
Frontierswe | 47.0 | — | 65.5 |
HLE HLE (Humanity's Last Exam) · a reasoning benchmark designed to be the hardest public evaluation of AI. Questions span mathematics, physics, philosophy, and logic · curated to be at or beyond the frontier of human expert capability. Tested with and without tool augmentation. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 46.9% without tools and 54.7% with tools · making it one of the few benchmarks where the top score is below 60%. | — | 43.7 | 52.5 |
PostTrainBench | 41.8 | 22.0 | — |
Remote Labor Index | 16.1 | — | 20.8 |
SimpleBench SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking. | 78.3 | 75.5 | — |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $10.00 | $50.00 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $200.00 | |
| $2.00 | $12.00 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $45.00 | |
| $10.00 | $50.00 | 1.1M tokens (~525 books) | $200.00 |