Compare · ModelsLive · 3 picked · head to head

Claude Mythos Preview vs Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.

Winner summary

Claude Opus 4.7 wins 11 of 18 shared benchmarks. Leads in coding · reasoning · arena.

Category leads
knowledge·Claude Mythos Previewcoding·Claude Opus 4.7agentic·Gemini 3.5 Flashreasoning·Claude Opus 4.7arena·Claude Opus 4.7math·Claude Opus 4.7
Hype vs Reality
Claude Mythos Preview
#4 by perf·#2 by attention
DESERVED
Claude Opus 4.7
#65 by perf·no signal
QUIET
Gemini 3.5 Flash
#44 by perf·no signal
QUIET
Best value
3.1x better value than Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Mythos Preview
no price
Claude Opus 4.7
3.9 pts/$
$15.00/M
Gemini 3.5 Flash
11.9 pts/$
$5.25/M
Vendor risk
Anthropic logo
Anthropic
$380.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
Anthropic logo
Anthropic
$380.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
Google DeepMind logo
Google DeepMind
$4.00T·Tier 1
Low risk
Head to head
Claude Mythos PreviewClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA diamond
Claude Mythos Preview leads by +4.1
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Claude Mythos Preview
94.5
Claude Opus 4.7
86.9
Gemini 3.5 Flash
90.4
SWE-Bench verified
Claude Mythos Preview leads by +10.4
SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. Claude Mythos Preview leads at 93.9%, crossing 90% for the first time in 2026. Opus 4.6 scores 80.8%. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability.
Claude Mythos Preview
93.9
Claude Opus 4.7
83.5
Gemini 3.5 Flash
79.3
APEX-Agents
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads by +15.7
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
Claude Opus 4.7
33.9
Gemini 3.5 Flash
49.6
ARC-AGI
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +1.0
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
Claude Opus 4.7
93.5
Gemini 3.5 Flash
92.5
ARC-AGI-2
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +3.7
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
Claude Opus 4.7
75.8
Gemini 3.5 Flash
72.1
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +51.3
Claude Opus 4.7
1556.9
Gemini 3.5 Flash
1505.5
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +16.9
Claude Opus 4.7
1493.1
Gemini 3.5 Flash
1476.3
Chess Puzzles
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads by +20.0
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
Claude Opus 4.7
30.0
Gemini 3.5 Flash
50.0
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +4.8
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
Claude Opus 4.7
43.8
Gemini 3.5 Flash
39.0
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +8.3
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
Claude Opus 4.7
22.9
Gemini 3.5 Flash
14.6
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +4.9
Claude Opus 4.7
31.7
Gemini 3.5 Flash
26.8
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +7.4
Claude Opus 4.7
70.2
Gemini 3.5 Flash
62.8
HLE
Claude Mythos Preview leads by +23.8
HLE (Humanity's Last Exam) · a reasoning benchmark designed to be the hardest public evaluation of AI. Questions span mathematics, physics, philosophy, and logic · curated to be at or beyond the frontier of human expert capability. Tested with and without tool augmentation. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 46.9% without tools and 54.7% with tools · making it one of the few benchmarks where the top score is below 60%.
Claude Mythos Preview
56.8
Claude Opus 4.7
33.0
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +2.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Claude Opus 4.7
97.8
Gemini 3.5 Flash
95.5
SimpleBench
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads by +16.6
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
Claude Opus 4.7
55.5
Gemini 3.5 Flash
72.0
SimpleQA Verified
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads by +17.8
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
Claude Opus 4.7
50.6
Gemini 3.5 Flash
68.4
Terminal Bench
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +8.2
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence.
Claude Mythos Preview
82.0
Claude Opus 4.7
90.2
WeirdML
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +13.8
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
Claude Opus 4.7
76.4
Gemini 3.5 Flash
62.6
Full benchmark table
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA diamond
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
94.586.990.4
SWE-Bench verified
SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. Claude Mythos Preview leads at 93.9%, crossing 90% for the first time in 2026. Opus 4.6 scores 80.8%. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability.
93.983.579.3
APEX-Agents
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
33.949.6
ARC-AGI
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
93.592.5
ARC-AGI-2
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
75.872.1
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
1556.91505.5
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
1493.11476.3
Chess Puzzles
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
30.050.0
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
43.839.0
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
22.914.6
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
31.726.8
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
70.262.8
HLE
HLE (Humanity's Last Exam) · a reasoning benchmark designed to be the hardest public evaluation of AI. Questions span mathematics, physics, philosophy, and logic · curated to be at or beyond the frontier of human expert capability. Tested with and without tool augmentation. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 46.9% without tools and 54.7% with tools · making it one of the few benchmarks where the top score is below 60%.
56.833.0
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
97.895.5
SimpleBench
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
55.572.0
SimpleQA Verified
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
50.668.4
Terminal Bench
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence.
82.090.2
WeirdML
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
76.462.6
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
ModelInputOutputContextProjected $/mo
Anthropic logoClaude Mythos Preview1.0M tokens (~500 books)
Anthropic logoClaude Opus 4.7$5.00$25.001.0M tokens (~500 books)$100.00
Google DeepMind logoGemini 3.5 Flash$1.50$9.001.0M tokens (~524 books)$33.75