Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Claude Opus 4 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Claude Opus 4 wins on 6/6 benchmarks
Claude Opus 4 wins 6 of 6 shared benchmarks. Leads in general · knowledge · math.
Category leads
general·Claude Opus 4knowledge·Claude Opus 4math·Claude Opus 4coding·Claude Opus 4
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Claude Opus 4
#150 by perf·#9 by attention
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
#216 by perf·#18 by attention
Best value
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
88.8x better value than Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4
1.0 pts/$
$45.00/M
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
90.7 pts/$
$0.40/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Anthropic
$965.0B·Tier 1
Meta AI
$1.87T·Tier 1
Head to head
6 benchmarks · 2 models
Claude Opus 4Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Dtbench
Claude Opus 4 leads by +36.0
Claude Opus 4
69.3
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
33.3
GPQA diamond
Claude Opus 4 leads by +42.8
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Claude Opus 4
68.3
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
25.6
Lmca
Claude Opus 4 leads by +26.6
Claude Opus 4
44.0
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
17.5
MATH level 5
Claude Opus 4 leads by +48.4
MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics.
Claude Opus 4
85.0
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
36.7
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Claude Opus 4 leads by +60.9
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Claude Opus 4
64.4
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
3.5
WeirdML
Claude Opus 4 leads by +34.8
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
Claude Opus 4
43.7
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
9.0
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
Dtbench | 69.3 | 33.3 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 68.3 | 25.6 |
Lmca | 44.0 | 17.5 |
MATH level 5 MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics. | 85.0 | 36.7 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 64.4 | 3.5 |
WeirdML WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns. | 43.7 | 9.0 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15.00 | $75.00 | 200K tokens (~100 books) | $300.00 | |
| $0.40 | $0.40 | 131K tokens (~66 books) | $4.00 |
People also compared
Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-5Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Opus 4.6GPT-5.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5.5 vs Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Opus 5.5 vs Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Mythos Preview vs Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct