Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.

Winner summary

Claude Opus 5.5 wins 13 of 13 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed · agentic · coding.

Category leads
speed·Claude Opus 5.5agentic·Claude Opus 5.5coding·Claude Opus 5.5math·Claude Opus 5.5knowledge·Claude Opus 5.5
Hype vs Reality
Claude Opus 5.5
#3 by perf·#6 by attention
DESERVED
Kimi K2.7 Code
#69 by perf·#17 by attention
UNDERRATED
Best value
4.5x better value than Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
6.9 pts/$
$12.00/M
Kimi K2.7 Code
30.5 pts/$
$1.84/M
Vendor risk
Anthropic logo
Anthropic
$965.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
moonshotai logo
Moonshot AI
$18.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
Head to head
Claude Opus 5.5Kimi K2.7 Code
Artificial Analysis · CritPt
Claude Opus 5.5 leads by +21.7
Claude Opus 5.5
31.7
Kimi K2.7 Code
10.0
Artificial Analysis · GDPval
Claude Opus 5.5 leads by +41.0
Claude Opus 5.5
67.3
Kimi K2.7 Code
26.3
Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam
Claude Opus 5.5 leads by +26.4
Claude Opus 5.5
61.4
Kimi K2.7 Code
35.0
Artificial Analysis · Long Context Reasoning
Claude Opus 5.5 leads by +5.4
Claude Opus 5.5
84.7
Kimi K2.7 Code
79.3
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
Claude Opus 5.5 leads by +31.8
Claude Opus 5.5
57.6
Kimi K2.7 Code
25.8
Artificial Analysis · SciCode
Claude Opus 5.5 leads by +19.1
Claude Opus 5.5
66.9
Kimi K2.7 Code
47.8
APEX-Agents
Claude Opus 5.5 leads by +35.9
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
Claude Opus 5.5
73.5
Kimi K2.7 Code
37.6
Frontiercode
Claude Opus 5.5 leads by +24.6
Claude Opus 5.5
54.6
Kimi K2.7 Code
30.1
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
Claude Opus 5.5 leads by +82.8
Claude Opus 5.5
95.0
Kimi K2.7 Code
12.2
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
Claude Opus 5.5 leads by +37.2
Claude Opus 5.5
91.2
Kimi K2.7 Code
54.0
GPQA diamond
Claude Opus 5.5 leads by +3.6
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Claude Opus 5.5
87.5
Kimi K2.7 Code
83.8
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Claude Opus 5.5 leads by +4.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Claude Opus 5.5
100.0
Kimi K2.7 Code
95.5
SimpleQA Verified
Claude Opus 5.5 leads by +35.7
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
Claude Opus 5.5
72.2
Kimi K2.7 Code
36.5
Full benchmark table
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Kimi K2.7 Code
Artificial Analysis · CritPt
31.710.0
Artificial Analysis · GDPval
67.326.3
Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam
61.435.0
Artificial Analysis · Long Context Reasoning
84.779.3
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
57.625.8
Artificial Analysis · SciCode
66.947.8
APEX-Agents
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
73.537.6
Frontiercode
54.630.1
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
95.012.2
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
91.254.0
GPQA diamond
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
87.583.8
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
100.095.5
SimpleQA Verified
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
72.236.5
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
ModelInputOutputContextProjected $/mo
Anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5$4.00$20.001.0M tokens (~500 books)$80.00
moonshotai logoKimi K2.7 Code$0.61$3.07262K tokens (~131 books)$12.26