Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
DeepSeek V3.1 vs o1
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
DeepSeek V3.1 wins on 3/6 benchmarks
DeepSeek V3.1 wins 3 of 6 shared benchmarks. Leads in general.
Category leads
general·DeepSeek V3.1knowledge·o1reasoning·o1coding·o1
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
DeepSeek V3.1
#118 by perf·no signal
o1
#158 by perf·no signal
Best value
DeepSeek V3.1
69.8x better value than o1
DeepSeek V3.1
84.5 pts/$
$0.60/M
o1
1.2 pts/$
$37.50/M
Vendor risk
Mixed exposure
One or more vendors flagged
DeepSeek
$3.4B·Tier 1
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
6 benchmarks · 2 models
DeepSeek V3.1o1
Dtbench
DeepSeek V3.1 leads by +13.3
DeepSeek V3.1
71.1
o1
57.8
Fiction.LiveBench
o1 leads by +30.5
Fiction.LiveBench · a continuously updated benchmark using recently published fiction to test reading comprehension and reasoning, preventing data contamination.
DeepSeek V3.1
52.8
o1
83.3
Lech Mazur Writing
DeepSeek V3.1 leads by +15.0
Lech Mazur Writing · evaluates creative writing ability, assessing prose quality, narrative coherence, and stylistic sophistication.
DeepSeek V3.1
85.2
o1
70.2
Lmca
DeepSeek V3.1 leads by +2.4
DeepSeek V3.1
28.6
o1
26.2
SimpleBench
o1 leads by +0.1
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
DeepSeek V3.1
28.0
o1
28.1
WeirdML
o1 leads by +7.7
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
DeepSeek V3.1
38.4
o1
46.1
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
Dtbench | 71.1 | 57.8 |
Fiction.LiveBench Fiction.LiveBench · a continuously updated benchmark using recently published fiction to test reading comprehension and reasoning, preventing data contamination. | 52.8 | 83.3 |
Lech Mazur Writing Lech Mazur Writing · evaluates creative writing ability, assessing prose quality, narrative coherence, and stylistic sophistication. | 85.2 | 70.2 |
Lmca | 28.6 | 26.2 |
SimpleBench SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking. | 28.0 | 28.1 |
WeirdML WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns. | 38.4 | 46.1 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.25 | $0.95 | 164K tokens (~82 books) | $4.25 | |
| $15.00 | $60.00 | 200K tokens (~100 books) | $262.50 |
People also compared