Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins on 3/3 benchmarks
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed.
Category leads
speed·Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
#44 by perf·no signal
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
#38 by perf·no signal
Best value
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
27.3x better value than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
236.4 pts/$
$0.25/M
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
8.7 pts/$
$7.00/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Google DeepMind
$4.00T·Tier 1
Google DeepMind
$4.00T·Tier 1
Head to head
3 benchmarks · 2 models
Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +47.4
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
11.7
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
59.1
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +37.4
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
18.1
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
55.5
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +35.5
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
21.6
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
57.2
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?" | 11.7 | 59.1 |
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads. | 18.1 | 55.5 |
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 21.6 | 57.2 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.10 | $0.40 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $1.75 | |
| $2.00 | $12.00 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $45.00 |
People also compared
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.5Claude Mythos Preview vs Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.4 ProGemini 2.0 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 2.0 Flash Lite vs Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemma 4 31BGemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingGemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs o3 Pro