Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on 6/6 benchmarks
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins 6 of 6 shared benchmarks. Leads in math · knowledge · language.
Category leads
math·Gemini 2.5 Proknowledge·Gemini 2.5 Prolanguage·Gemini 2.5 Procoding·Gemini 2.5 Pro
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Gemini 2.5 Pro
#59 by perf·no signal
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
#55 by perf·no signal
Best value
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
32.6x better value than Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
10.0 pts/$
$5.63/M
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
325.7 pts/$
$0.18/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Google DeepMind
$4.00T·Tier 1
Baidu
$45.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
6 benchmarks · 2 models
Gemini 2.5 ProERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
OpenCompass · AIME2025
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +12.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
88.7
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
76.2
OpenCompass · GPQA-Diamond
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +24.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
84.7
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
60.2
OpenCompass · HLE
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +14.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro
21.1
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
6.5
OpenCompass · IFEval
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +8.8
Gemini 2.5 Pro
90.0
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
81.2
OpenCompass · LiveCodeBenchV6
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +24.3
Gemini 2.5 Pro
71.3
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
47.0
OpenCompass · MMLU-Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +15.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro
85.8
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
70.8
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
OpenCompass · AIME2025 | 88.7 | 76.2 |
OpenCompass · GPQA-Diamond | 84.7 | 60.2 |
OpenCompass · HLE | 21.1 | 6.5 |
OpenCompass · IFEval | 90.0 | 81.2 |
OpenCompass · LiveCodeBenchV6 | 71.3 | 47.0 |
OpenCompass · MMLU-Pro | 85.8 | 70.8 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1.25 | $10.00 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $34.38 | |
| $0.07 | $0.28 | 131K tokens (~66 books) | $1.23 |