Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Gemini 3.5 Flash wins on 5/5 benchmarks
Gemini 3.5 Flash wins 5 of 5 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed · arena.
Category leads
speed·Gemini 3.5 Flasharena·Gemini 3.5 Flash
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Gemini 3.5 Flash
#44 by perf·no signal
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
#5 by perf·no signal
Best value
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
4.6x better value than Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash
11.9 pts/$
$5.25/M
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
55.3 pts/$
$1.42/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Google DeepMind
$4.00T·Tier 1
Alibaba (Qwen)
$293.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
5 benchmarks · 2 models
Gemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.5 397B A17B
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads by +17.6
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
Gemini 3.5 Flash
37.5
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
19.9
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads by +21.9
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
70.1
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
48.2
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads by +16.5
Gemini 3.5 Flash
50.2
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
33.7
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads by +111.0
Gemini 3.5 Flash
1505.5
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
1394.5
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads by +32.5
Gemini 3.5 Flash
1476.3
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
1443.7
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?" | 37.5 | 19.9 |
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads. | 70.1 | 48.2 |
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 50.2 | 33.7 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding | 1505.5 | 1394.5 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall | 1476.3 | 1443.7 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1.50 | $9.00 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $33.75 | |
| $0.39 | $2.45 | 256K tokens (~128 books) | $9.01 |
People also compared