Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Claude Opus 4.5
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Gemini 3 Flash Preview wins on 10/20 benchmarks
Gemini 3 Flash Preview wins 10 of 20 shared benchmarks. Leads in agentic · knowledge · math.
Category leads
agentic·Gemini 3 Flash Previewreasoning·Claude Opus 4.5arena·Claude Opus 4.5knowledge·Gemini 3 Flash Previewmath·Gemini 3 Flash Previewcoding·Claude Opus 4.5
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
#96 by perf·no signal
Claude Opus 4.5
#111 by perf·no signal
Best value
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
9.3x better value than Claude Opus 4.5
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
28.1 pts/$
$1.75/M
Claude Opus 4.5
3.0 pts/$
$15.00/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Google DeepMind
$4.00T·Tier 1
Anthropic
$380.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
20 benchmarks · 2 models
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewClaude Opus 4.5
APEX-Agents
Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads by +5.6
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
24.0
Claude Opus 4.5
18.4
ARC-AGI
Claude Opus 4.5 leads by +58.5
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
21.5
Claude Opus 4.5
80.0
ARC-AGI-2
Claude Opus 4.5 leads by +4.0
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
33.6
Claude Opus 4.5
37.6
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
Claude Opus 4.5 leads by +28.8
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
1436.4
Claude Opus 4.5
1465.2
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads by +6.2
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
1473.9
Claude Opus 4.5
1467.7
Chess Puzzles
Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads by +26.0
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
38.0
Claude Opus 4.5
12.0
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads by +14.9
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
35.6
Claude Opus 4.5
20.7
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
4.2
Claude Opus 4.5
4.2
GeoBench
Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads by +13.0
GeoBench · tests geographic knowledge and spatial reasoning across countries, landmarks, coordinates, and geopolitical understanding.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
88.0
Claude Opus 4.5
75.0
GPQA diamond
Claude Opus 4.5 leads by +3.8
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
77.6
Claude Opus 4.5
81.4
GSO-Bench
Claude Opus 4.5 leads by +16.7
GSO-Bench · evaluates AI models on real-world open-source software engineering tasks, testing the ability to understand and resolve actual GitHub issues.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
9.8
Claude Opus 4.5
26.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads by +6.7
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
92.8
Claude Opus 4.5
86.1
MCP Atlas
Claude Opus 4.5 leads by +4.9
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
57.4
Claude Opus 4.5
62.3
SciPredict
Claude Opus 4.5 leads by +0.8
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
22.2
Claude Opus 4.5
23.1
SimpleBench
Claude Opus 4.5 leads by +1.1
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
53.3
Claude Opus 4.5
54.4
SimpleQA Verified
Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads by +25.6
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
67.4
Claude Opus 4.5
41.8
SWE-Bench verified
Claude Opus 4.5 leads by +1.2
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
75.4
Claude Opus 4.5
76.7
Terminal Bench
Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads by +1.2
Terminal Bench · tests the ability to accomplish real-world tasks using terminal commands, evaluating shell scripting and CLI tool proficiency.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
64.3
Claude Opus 4.5
63.1
VPCT
Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads by +48.9
VPCT (Visual Pattern Completion Test) · tests visual reasoning and pattern recognition by having models complete visual sequences and transformations.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
58.9
Claude Opus 4.5
10.0
WeirdML
Claude Opus 4.5 leads by +2.1
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
61.6
Claude Opus 4.5
63.7
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Claude Opus 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
APEX-Agents APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments. | 24.0 | 18.4 |
ARC-AGI ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization. | 21.5 | 80.0 |
ARC-AGI-2 ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data. | 33.6 | 37.6 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding | 1436.4 | 1465.2 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall | 1473.9 | 1467.7 |
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities. | 38.0 | 12.0 |
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning. | 35.6 | 20.7 |
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning. | 4.2 | 4.2 |
GeoBench GeoBench · tests geographic knowledge and spatial reasoning across countries, landmarks, coordinates, and geopolitical understanding. | 88.0 | 75.0 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 77.6 | 81.4 |
GSO-Bench GSO-Bench · evaluates AI models on real-world open-source software engineering tasks, testing the ability to understand and resolve actual GitHub issues. | 9.8 | 26.5 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 92.8 | 86.1 |
MCP Atlas | 57.4 | 62.3 |
SciPredict | 22.2 | 23.1 |
SimpleBench SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking. | 53.3 | 54.4 |
SimpleQA Verified SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information. | 67.4 | 41.8 |
SWE-Bench verified | 75.4 | 76.7 |
Terminal Bench Terminal Bench · tests the ability to accomplish real-world tasks using terminal commands, evaluating shell scripting and CLI tool proficiency. | 64.3 | 63.1 |
VPCT VPCT (Visual Pattern Completion Test) · tests visual reasoning and pattern recognition by having models complete visual sequences and transformations. | 58.9 | 10.0 |
WeirdML WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns. | 61.6 | 63.7 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.50 | $3.00 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $11.25 | |
| $5.00 | $25.00 | 200K tokens (~100 books) | $100.00 |
People also compared