Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.7
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GLM 5.2 wins on 1/2 benchmarks
GLM 5.2 wins 1 of 2 shared benchmarks. Leads in arena.
Category leads
arena·GLM 5.2
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
GLM 5.2
#11 by perf·no signal
Claude Opus 4.7
#65 by perf·no signal
Best value
GLM 5.2
7.9x better value than Claude Opus 4.7
GLM 5.2
30.5 pts/$
$2.50/M
Claude Opus 4.7
3.9 pts/$
$15.00/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
z-ai
private · undisclosed
Anthropic
$380.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
2 benchmarks · 2 models
GLM 5.2Claude Opus 4.7
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
GLM 5.2 leads by +36.4
GLM 5.2
1593.3
Claude Opus 4.7
1556.9
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +22.2
GLM 5.2
1471.0
Claude Opus 4.7
1493.1
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | GLM 5.2 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding | 1593.3 | 1556.9 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall | 1471.0 | 1493.1 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1.00 | $4.00 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $17.50 | |
| $5.00 | $25.00 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $100.00 |