Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
GLM 5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GLM 5.2 wins on 9/11 benchmarks
GLM 5.2 wins 9 of 11 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed · coding · reasoning.
Category leads
speed·GLM 5.2coding·GLM 5.2reasoning·GLM 5.2language·GLM 5.2math·GLM 5.2knowledge·GLM 5.2
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
GLM 5.2
#11 by perf·no signal
Kimi K2.7 Code
#42 by perf·no signal
Best value
Kimi K2.7 Code
1.1x better value than GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2
30.5 pts/$
$2.50/M
Kimi K2.7 Code
34.3 pts/$
$1.84/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
z-ai
private · undisclosed
moonshotai
private · undisclosed
Head to head
11 benchmarks · 2 models
GLM 5.2Kimi K2.7 Code
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
GLM 5.2 leads by +13.5
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
GLM 5.2
43.1
Kimi K2.7 Code
29.6
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
GLM 5.2 leads by +8.0
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
GLM 5.2
68.8
Kimi K2.7 Code
60.8
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
GLM 5.2 leads by +9.1
GLM 5.2
51.1
Kimi K2.7 Code
42.0
LiveBench · Agentic Coding
GLM 5.2 leads by +3.3
GLM 5.2
73.3
Kimi K2.7 Code
70.0
LiveBench · Coding
GLM 5.2 leads by +5.7
GLM 5.2
79.7
Kimi K2.7 Code
74.0
LiveBench · Data Analysis
GLM 5.2 leads by +11.1
GLM 5.2
73.7
Kimi K2.7 Code
62.7
LiveBench · If
GLM 5.2 leads by +6.0
GLM 5.2
62.3
Kimi K2.7 Code
56.3
LiveBench · Language
Kimi K2.7 Code leads by +1.7
GLM 5.2
76.2
Kimi K2.7 Code
77.9
LiveBench · Mathematics
GLM 5.2 leads by +10.2
GLM 5.2
89.8
Kimi K2.7 Code
79.6
LiveBench · Overall
GLM 5.2 leads by +4.3
GLM 5.2
76.2
Kimi K2.7 Code
71.9
LiveBench · Reasoning
Kimi K2.7 Code leads by +4.2
GLM 5.2
78.6
Kimi K2.7 Code
82.8
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | GLM 5.2 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?" | 43.1 | 29.6 |
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads. | 68.8 | 60.8 |
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 51.1 | 42.0 |
LiveBench · Agentic Coding | 73.3 | 70.0 |
LiveBench · Coding | 79.7 | 74.0 |
LiveBench · Data Analysis | 73.7 | 62.7 |
LiveBench · If | 62.3 | 56.3 |
LiveBench · Language | 76.2 | 77.9 |
LiveBench · Mathematics | 89.8 | 79.6 |
LiveBench · Overall | 76.2 | 71.9 |
LiveBench · Reasoning | 78.6 | 82.8 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1.00 | $4.00 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $17.50 | |
| $0.61 | $3.07 | 262K tokens (~131 books) | $12.26 |