Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
GPT-4 Turbo vs Llama 3.1 405B
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Llama 3.1 405B wins on 7/10 benchmarks
Llama 3.1 405B wins 7 of 10 shared benchmarks. Leads in reasoning · knowledge · math.
Category leads
reasoning·Llama 3.1 405Bknowledge·Llama 3.1 405Bmath·Llama 3.1 405Bcoding·Llama 3.1 405B
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
GPT-4 Turbo
#90 by perf·no signal
Llama 3.1 405B
#153 by perf·no signal
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Meta AI
$1.50T·Tier 1
Head to head
10 benchmarks · 2 models
GPT-4 TurboLlama 3.1 405B
BBH
Llama 3.1 405B leads by +10.4
BIG-Bench Hard · a curated subset of 23 challenging tasks from BIG-Bench where language models previously failed to outperform average humans.
GPT-4 Turbo
66.8
Llama 3.1 405B
77.2
GPQA diamond
Llama 3.1 405B leads by +27.0
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
GPT-4 Turbo
7.5
Llama 3.1 405B
34.5
HellaSwag
GPT-4 Turbo leads by +8.1
HellaSwag · tests commonsense reasoning by asking models to predict the most plausible continuation of everyday scenarios.
GPT-4 Turbo
93.7
Llama 3.1 405B
85.6
MATH level 5
Llama 3.1 405B leads by +26.8
MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics.
GPT-4 Turbo
23.0
Llama 3.1 405B
49.8
MMLU
Llama 3.1 405B leads by +2.8
Massive Multitask Language Understanding · 57 subjects spanning STEM, humanities, social sciences, and more. The standard benchmark for broad knowledge.
GPT-4 Turbo
76.5
Llama 3.1 405B
79.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Llama 3.1 405B leads by +8.6
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
GPT-4 Turbo
1.0
Llama 3.1 405B
9.6
SimpleBench
GPT-4 Turbo leads by +2.5
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
GPT-4 Turbo
10.1
Llama 3.1 405B
7.6
TriviaQA
GPT-4 Turbo leads by +2.1
TriviaQA · reading comprehension benchmark with trivia questions, requiring models to find and reason over evidence from provided documents.
GPT-4 Turbo
84.8
Llama 3.1 405B
82.7
WeirdML
Llama 3.1 405B leads by +8.9
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
GPT-4 Turbo
12.4
Llama 3.1 405B
21.4
Winogrande
Llama 3.1 405B leads by +3.4
WinoGrande · large-scale commonsense reasoning benchmark where models must resolve ambiguous pronouns in carefully constructed sentence pairs.
GPT-4 Turbo
75.0
Llama 3.1 405B
78.4
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Llama 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|
BBH BIG-Bench Hard · a curated subset of 23 challenging tasks from BIG-Bench where language models previously failed to outperform average humans. | 66.8 | 77.2 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 7.5 | 34.5 |
HellaSwag HellaSwag · tests commonsense reasoning by asking models to predict the most plausible continuation of everyday scenarios. | 93.7 | 85.6 |
MATH level 5 MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics. | 23.0 | 49.8 |
MMLU Massive Multitask Language Understanding · 57 subjects spanning STEM, humanities, social sciences, and more. The standard benchmark for broad knowledge. | 76.5 | 79.3 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 1.0 | 9.6 |
SimpleBench SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking. | 10.1 | 7.6 |
TriviaQA TriviaQA · reading comprehension benchmark with trivia questions, requiring models to find and reason over evidence from provided documents. | 84.8 | 82.7 |
WeirdML WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns. | 12.4 | 21.4 |
Winogrande WinoGrande · large-scale commonsense reasoning benchmark where models must resolve ambiguous pronouns in carefully constructed sentence pairs. | 75.0 | 78.4 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $10.00 | $30.00 | 128K tokens (~64 books) | $150.00 | |
| — | — | — | — |
People also compared