Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
GPT-5.1 vs GLM 4.7
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GPT-5.1 wins on 9/11 benchmarks
GPT-5.1 wins 9 of 11 shared benchmarks. Leads in agentic · knowledge · math.
Category leads
agentic·GPT-5.1arena·GLM 4.7knowledge·GPT-5.1math·GPT-5.1reasoning·GPT-5.1coding·GPT-5.1
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
GPT-5.1
#97 by perf·no signal
GLM 4.7
#93 by perf·no signal
Best value
GLM 4.7
5.4x better value than GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1
8.8 pts/$
$5.63/M
GLM 4.7
47.6 pts/$
$1.06/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
z-ai
private · undisclosed
Head to head
11 benchmarks · 2 models
GPT-5.1GLM 4.7
APEX-Agents
GPT-5.1 leads by +14.4
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
GPT-5.1
17.5
GLM 4.7
3.1
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
GLM 4.7 leads by +100.4
GPT-5.1
1338.8
GLM 4.7
1439.2
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
GLM 4.7 leads by +4.2
GPT-5.1
1438.5
GLM 4.7
1442.7
Chess Puzzles
GPT-5.1 leads by +26.0
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
GPT-5.1
32.0
GLM 4.7
6.0
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
GPT-5.1 leads by +28.6
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
GPT-5.1
31.0
GLM 4.7
2.4
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
GPT-5.1 leads by +12.4
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
GPT-5.1
12.5
GLM 4.7
0.1
GPQA diamond
GPT-5.1 leads by +5.7
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
GPT-5.1
83.5
GLM 4.7
77.8
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
GPT-5.1 leads by +5.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
GPT-5.1
88.6
GLM 4.7
83.3
SimpleBench
GPT-5.1 leads by +6.6
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
GPT-5.1
43.8
GLM 4.7
37.2
SimpleQA Verified
GPT-5.1 leads by +17.4
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
GPT-5.1
48.9
GLM 4.7
31.5
Terminal Bench
GPT-5.1 leads by +14.2
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence.
GPT-5.1
47.6
GLM 4.7
33.4
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1 | GLM 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
APEX-Agents APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments. | 17.5 | 3.1 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding | 1338.8 | 1439.2 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall | 1438.5 | 1442.7 |
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities. | 32.0 | 6.0 |
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning. | 31.0 | 2.4 |
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning. | 12.5 | 0.1 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 83.5 | 77.8 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 88.6 | 83.3 |
SimpleBench SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking. | 43.8 | 37.2 |
SimpleQA Verified SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information. | 48.9 | 31.5 |
Terminal Bench Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence. | 47.6 | 33.4 |