Compare · ModelsLive · 3 picked · head to head

GPT-5.4 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.4

Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.

Winner summary

GPT-5.4 wins 9 of 23 shared benchmarks. Leads in coding · speed · agentic.

Category leads
reasoning·Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewknowledge·Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewmath·GPT-5.4 Procoding·GPT-5.4speed·GPT-5.4agentic·GPT-5.4arena·Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Hype vs Reality
GPT-5.4 Pro
#41 by perf·no signal
QUIET
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
#74 by perf·no signal
QUIET
GPT-5.4
#61 by perf·no signal
QUIET
Best value
1.2x better value than GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 Pro
0.6 pts/$
$105.00/M
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
8.1 pts/$
$7.00/M
GPT-5.4
6.7 pts/$
$8.75/M
Vendor risk
OpenAI logo
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
Google DeepMind logo
Google DeepMind
$4.00T·Tier 1
Low risk
OpenAI logo
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
Head to head
GPT-5.4 ProGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-5.4
ARC-AGI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +3.5
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
GPT-5.4 Pro
94.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
98.0
GPT-5.4
93.7
ARC-AGI-2
GPT-5.4 Pro leads by +6.2
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
GPT-5.4 Pro
83.3
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
77.1
GPT-5.4
74.0
Chess Puzzles
GPT-5.4 Pro leads by +3.6
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
GPT-5.4 Pro
58.6
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
55.0
GPT-5.4
44.0
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
GPT-5.4 Pro leads by +2.4
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
GPT-5.4 Pro
50.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
36.9
GPT-5.4
47.6
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
GPT-5.4 Pro leads by +10.4
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
GPT-5.4 Pro
37.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
16.7
GPT-5.4
27.1
GPQA diamond
GPT-5.4 Pro leads by +0.7
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
GPT-5.4 Pro
92.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
92.1
GPT-5.4
91.1
HLE
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +2.2
HLE (Humanity's Last Exam) · a reasoning benchmark designed to be the hardest public evaluation of AI. Questions span mathematics, physics, philosophy, and logic · curated to be at or beyond the frontier of human expert capability. Tested with and without tool augmentation. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 46.9% without tools and 54.7% with tools · making it one of the few benchmarks where the top score is below 60%.
GPT-5.4 Pro
41.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
43.7
GPT-5.4
33.0
SimpleQA Verified
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +29.5
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
GPT-5.4 Pro
47.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
77.3
GPT-5.4
44.8
WeirdML
GPT-5.4 leads by +5.6
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
GPT-5.4 Pro
57.4
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
72.1
GPT-5.4
77.7
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
GPT-5.4 leads by +48.0
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
21.4
GPT-5.4
69.4
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +11.6
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
68.8
GPT-5.4
57.3
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
GPT-5.4 leads by +10.7
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
46.5
GPT-5.4
57.2
APEX-Agents
GPT-5.4 leads by +2.4
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
33.5
GPT-5.4
35.9
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +35.9
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
1447.0
GPT-5.4
1411.1
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +18.7
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
1486.4
GPT-5.4
1467.7
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
GPT-5.4 leads by +22.2
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
26.8
GPT-5.4
49.0
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
GPT-5.4 leads by +18.9
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
59.6
GPT-5.4
78.6
GSO-Bench
GPT-5.4 leads by +8.8
GSO-Bench · evaluates AI models on real-world open-source software engineering tasks, testing the ability to understand and resolve actual GitHub issues.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
22.6
GPT-5.4
31.4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +0.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
95.6
GPT-5.4
95.3
PostTrainBench
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +1.4
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
21.6
GPT-5.4
20.2
SimpleBench
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +6.6
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
GPT-5.4 Pro
68.9
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
75.5
SWE-Bench verified
GPT-5.4 leads by +1.2
SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. Claude Mythos Preview leads at 93.9%, crossing 90% for the first time in 2026. Opus 4.6 scores 80.8%. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
75.6
GPT-5.4
76.9
Terminal Bench
GPT-5.4 leads by +1.6
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
80.2
GPT-5.4
81.8
Full benchmark table
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-5.4
ARC-AGI
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
94.598.093.7
ARC-AGI-2
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
83.377.174.0
Chess Puzzles
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
58.655.044.0
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
50.036.947.6
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
37.516.727.1
GPQA diamond
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
92.892.191.1
HLE
HLE (Humanity's Last Exam) · a reasoning benchmark designed to be the hardest public evaluation of AI. Questions span mathematics, physics, philosophy, and logic · curated to be at or beyond the frontier of human expert capability. Tested with and without tool augmentation. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 46.9% without tools and 54.7% with tools · making it one of the few benchmarks where the top score is below 60%.
41.543.733.0
SimpleQA Verified
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
47.877.344.8
WeirdML
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
57.472.177.7
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
21.469.4
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
68.857.3
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
46.557.2
APEX-Agents
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
33.535.9
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
1447.01411.1
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
1486.41467.7
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
26.849.0
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
59.678.6
GSO-Bench
GSO-Bench · evaluates AI models on real-world open-source software engineering tasks, testing the ability to understand and resolve actual GitHub issues.
22.631.4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
95.695.3
PostTrainBench
21.620.2
SimpleBench
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
68.975.5
SWE-Bench verified
SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. Claude Mythos Preview leads at 93.9%, crossing 90% for the first time in 2026. Opus 4.6 scores 80.8%. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability.
75.676.9
Terminal Bench
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence.
80.281.8
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
ModelInputOutputContextProjected $/mo
OpenAI logoGPT-5.4 Pro$30.00$180.001.1M tokens (~525 books)$675.00
Google DeepMind logoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview$2.00$12.001.0M tokens (~524 books)$45.00
OpenAI logoGPT-5.4$2.50$15.001.1M tokens (~525 books)$56.25