Compare · ModelsLive · 3 picked · head to head
GPT-5.4 Pro vs GPT-5.2 Pro vs GPT-5.4
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GPT-5.4 Pro wins on 8/8 benchmarks
GPT-5.4 Pro wins 8 of 8 shared benchmarks. Leads in reasoning · math · knowledge.
Category leads
reasoning·GPT-5.4 Promath·GPT-5.4 Proknowledge·GPT-5.4 Pro
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
GPT-5.4 Pro
#26 by perf·no signal
GPT-5.2 Pro
#62 by perf·no signal
GPT-5.4
#46 by perf·no signal
Best value
GPT-5.4
10.6x better value than GPT-5.4 Pro
GPT-5.4 Pro
0.6 pts/$
$105.00/M
GPT-5.2 Pro
0.6 pts/$
$94.50/M
GPT-5.4
6.7 pts/$
$8.75/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
8 benchmarks · 3 models
GPT-5.4 ProGPT-5.2 ProGPT-5.4
ARC-AGI
GPT-5.4 Pro leads by +0.8
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
GPT-5.4 Pro
94.5
GPT-5.2 Pro
90.5
GPT-5.4
93.7
ARC-AGI-2
GPT-5.4 Pro leads by +9.4
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
GPT-5.4 Pro
83.3
GPT-5.2 Pro
54.2
GPT-5.4
74.0
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
GPT-5.4 Pro leads by +6.2
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
GPT-5.4 Pro
37.5
GPT-5.2 Pro
31.3
GPT-5.4
27.1
Chess Puzzles
GPT-5.4 Pro leads by +14.6
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
GPT-5.4 Pro
58.6
GPT-5.4
44.0
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
GPT-5.4 Pro leads by +2.4
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
GPT-5.4 Pro
50.0
GPT-5.4
47.6
GPQA diamond
GPT-5.4 Pro leads by +1.7
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
GPT-5.4 Pro
92.8
GPT-5.4
91.1
SimpleBench
GPT-5.4 Pro leads by +20.0
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
GPT-5.4 Pro
68.9
GPT-5.2 Pro
48.9
SimpleQA Verified
GPT-5.4 Pro leads by +3.0
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
GPT-5.4 Pro
47.8
GPT-5.4
44.8
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|---|
ARC-AGI ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization. | 94.5 | 90.5 | 93.7 |
ARC-AGI-2 ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data. | 83.3 | 54.2 | 74.0 |
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning. | 37.5 | 31.3 | 27.1 |
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities. | 58.6 | — | 44.0 |
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning. | 50.0 | — | 47.6 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 92.8 | — | 91.1 |
SimpleBench SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking. | 68.9 | 48.9 | — |
SimpleQA Verified SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information. | 47.8 | — | 44.8 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $30.00 | $180.00 | 1.1M tokens (~525 books) | $675.00 | |
| $21.00 | $168.00 | 400K tokens (~200 books) | $577.50 | |
| $2.50 | $15.00 | 1.1M tokens (~525 books) | $56.25 |