Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
GPT-5.4 vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GPT-5.4 wins on 12/15 benchmarks
GPT-5.4 wins 12 of 15 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed · agentic · reasoning.
Category leads
speed·GPT-5.4agentic·GPT-5.4reasoning·GPT-5.4arena·Gemini 3 Flash Previewknowledge·GPT-5.4math·GPT-5.4coding·GPT-5.4
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
GPT-5.4
#46 by perf·no signal
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
#98 by perf·no signal
Best value
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
4.2x better value than GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4
6.7 pts/$
$8.75/M
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
28.1 pts/$
$1.75/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Google DeepMind
$4.00T·Tier 1
Head to head
15 benchmarks · 2 models
GPT-5.4Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
GPT-5.4 leads by +19.8
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
GPT-5.4
69.4
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
49.7
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
GPT-5.4 leads by +14.6
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
GPT-5.4
57.3
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
42.6
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
GPT-5.4 leads by +10.7
GPT-5.4
57.2
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
46.4
APEX-Agents
GPT-5.4 leads by +11.9
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
GPT-5.4
35.9
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
24.0
ARC-AGI
GPT-5.4 leads by +72.2
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
GPT-5.4
93.7
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
21.5
ARC-AGI-2
GPT-5.4 leads by +40.3
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
GPT-5.4
74.0
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
33.6
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads by +8.1
GPT-5.4
1465.8
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
1473.9
Chess Puzzles
GPT-5.4 leads by +6.0
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
GPT-5.4
44.0
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
38.0
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
GPT-5.4 leads by +12.0
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
GPT-5.4
47.6
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
35.6
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
GPT-5.4 leads by +22.9
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
GPT-5.4
27.1
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
4.2
GPQA diamond
GPT-5.4 leads by +13.5
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
GPT-5.4
91.1
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
77.6
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
GPT-5.4 leads by +2.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
GPT-5.4
95.3
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
92.8
SimpleQA Verified
Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads by +22.6
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
GPT-5.4
44.8
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
67.4
SWE-Bench verified
GPT-5.4 leads by +1.5
SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. Claude Mythos Preview leads at 93.9%, crossing 90% for the first time in 2026. Opus 4.6 scores 80.8%. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability.
GPT-5.4
76.9
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
75.4
WeirdML
Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads by +4.2
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
GPT-5.4
57.4
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
61.6
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?" | 69.4 | 49.7 |
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads. | 57.3 | 42.6 |
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 57.2 | 46.4 |
APEX-Agents APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments. | 35.9 | 24.0 |
ARC-AGI ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization. | 93.7 | 21.5 |
ARC-AGI-2 ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data. | 74.0 | 33.6 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall | 1465.8 | 1473.9 |
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities. | 44.0 | 38.0 |
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning. | 47.6 | 35.6 |
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning. | 27.1 | 4.2 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 91.1 | 77.6 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 95.3 | 92.8 |
SimpleQA Verified SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information. | 44.8 | 67.4 |
SWE-Bench verified SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. Claude Mythos Preview leads at 93.9%, crossing 90% for the first time in 2026. Opus 4.6 scores 80.8%. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability. | 76.9 | 75.4 |
WeirdML WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns. | 57.4 | 61.6 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2.50 | $15.00 | 1.1M tokens (~525 books) | $56.25 | |
| $0.50 | $3.00 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $11.25 |