Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head

GPT-5.5 vs Kimi K2 Thinking

Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.

Winner summary

GPT-5.5 wins 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Leads in knowledge · coding.

Category leads
knowledge·GPT-5.5coding·GPT-5.5
Hype vs Reality
GPT-5.5
#2 by perf·no signal
QUIET
Kimi K2 Thinking
#79 by perf·no signal
QUIET
Best value
7.1x better value than GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5
4.9 pts/$
$17.50/M
Kimi K2 Thinking
34.4 pts/$
$1.55/M
Vendor risk
OpenAI logo
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
moonshotai logo
moonshotai
private · undisclosed
Unknown
Head to head
GPT-5.5Kimi K2 Thinking
GPQA diamond
GPT-5.5 leads by +14.6
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
GPT-5.5
93.6
Kimi K2 Thinking
79.0
Terminal Bench
GPT-5.5 leads by +47.0
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence.
GPT-5.5
82.7
Kimi K2 Thinking
35.7
Full benchmark table
BenchmarkGPT-5.5Kimi K2 Thinking
GPQA diamond
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
93.679.0
Terminal Bench
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence.
82.735.7
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
ModelInputOutputContextProjected $/mo
OpenAI logoGPT-5.5$5.00$30.00400K tokens (~200 books)$112.50
moonshotai logoKimi K2 Thinking$0.60$2.50262K tokens (~131 books)$10.75