Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
GPT-5.5 vs MiniMax M2.7
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GPT-5.5 wins on 1/1 benchmarks
GPT-5.5 wins 1 of 1 shared benchmarks. Leads in coding.
Category leads
coding·GPT-5.5
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
GPT-5.5
#2 by perf·#4 by attention
MiniMax M2.7
#120 by perf·#11 by attention
Best value
MiniMax M2.7
19.8x better value than GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5
4.9 pts/$
$17.50/M
MiniMax M2.7
96.2 pts/$
$0.53/M
Vendor risk
Mixed exposure
One or more vendors flagged
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
MiniMax
$4.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
1 benchmark · 2 models
GPT-5.5MiniMax M2.7
Terminal Bench
GPT-5.5 leads by +37.6
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence.
GPT-5.5
82.7
MiniMax M2.7
45.1
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
Terminal Bench Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence. | 82.7 | 45.1 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $5.00 | $30.00 | 400K tokens (~200 books) | $112.50 | |
| $0.21 | $0.84 | 205K tokens (~102 books) | $3.67 |