Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Grok 3 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Grok 3 wins on 8/10 benchmarks
Grok 3 wins 8 of 10 shared benchmarks. Leads in coding · knowledge · math.
Category leads
coding·Grok 3reasoning·Gemini 2.0 Flashknowledge·Grok 3math·Grok 3
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Grok 3
#150 by perf·#9 by attention
Gemini 2.0 Flash
#101 by perf·no signal
Best value
Gemini 2.0 Flash
45.0x better value than Grok 3
Grok 3
4.3 pts/$
$9.00/M
Gemini 2.0 Flash
192.0 pts/$
$0.25/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
xAI
$250.0B·Tier 1
Google DeepMind
$4.00T·Tier 1
Head to head
10 benchmarks · 2 models
Grok 3Gemini 2.0 Flash
Aider polyglot
Grok 3 leads by +15.1
Aider Polyglot · measures how well AI models can edit code across multiple programming languages using the Aider coding assistant framework.
Grok 3
53.3
Gemini 2.0 Flash
38.2
ARC-AGI-2
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads by +1.2
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
Grok 3
0.1
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1.3
Fiction.LiveBench
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads by +2.8
Fiction.LiveBench · a continuously updated benchmark using recently published fiction to test reading comprehension and reasoning, preventing data contamination.
Grok 3
58.3
Gemini 2.0 Flash
61.1
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
Grok 3 leads by +2.1
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
Grok 3
3.8
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1.7
GPQA diamond
Grok 3 leads by +15.5
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Grok 3
67.7
Gemini 2.0 Flash
52.2
Lech Mazur Writing
Grok 3 leads by +4.9
Lech Mazur Writing · evaluates creative writing ability, assessing prose quality, narrative coherence, and stylistic sophistication.
Grok 3
76.4
Gemini 2.0 Flash
71.5
MATH level 5
Grok 3 leads by +6.6
MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics.
Grok 3
88.8
Gemini 2.0 Flash
82.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Grok 3 leads by +24.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Grok 3
55.5
Gemini 2.0 Flash
31.0
SimpleBench
Grok 3 leads by +6.0
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
Grok 3
23.3
Gemini 2.0 Flash
17.3
WeirdML
Grok 3 leads by +11.5
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
Grok 3
37.2
Gemini 2.0 Flash
25.8
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Gemini 2.0 Flash |
|---|---|---|
Aider polyglot Aider Polyglot · measures how well AI models can edit code across multiple programming languages using the Aider coding assistant framework. | 53.3 | 38.2 |
ARC-AGI-2 ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data. | 0.1 | 1.3 |
Fiction.LiveBench Fiction.LiveBench · a continuously updated benchmark using recently published fiction to test reading comprehension and reasoning, preventing data contamination. | 58.3 | 61.1 |
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning. | 3.8 | 1.7 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 67.7 | 52.2 |
Lech Mazur Writing Lech Mazur Writing · evaluates creative writing ability, assessing prose quality, narrative coherence, and stylistic sophistication. | 76.4 | 71.5 |
MATH level 5 MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics. | 88.8 | 82.2 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 55.5 | 31.0 |
SimpleBench SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking. | 23.3 | 17.3 |
WeirdML WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns. | 37.2 | 25.8 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $3.00 | $15.00 | 131K tokens (~66 books) | $60.00 | |
| $0.10 | $0.40 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $1.75 |
People also compared