Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head

Grok 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.

Winner summary

Gemini 2.5 Pro wins 13 of 22 shared benchmarks. Leads in coding · knowledge.

Category leads
coding·Gemini 2.5 Proreasoning·Grok 4knowledge·Gemini 2.5 Promath·Grok 4language·Grok 4
Hype vs Reality
Grok 4
#73 by perf·no signal
QUIET
Gemini 2.5 Pro
#61 by perf·no signal
QUIET
Best value
1.6x better value than Grok 4
Grok 4
6.1 pts/$
$9.00/M
Gemini 2.5 Pro
10.0 pts/$
$5.63/M
Vendor risk
xAI logo
xAI
$250.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
Google DeepMind logo
Google DeepMind
$4.00T·Tier 1
Low risk
Head to head
Grok 4Gemini 2.5 Pro
Aider polyglot
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +3.5
Aider Polyglot · measures how well AI models can edit code across multiple programming languages using the Aider coding assistant framework.
Grok 4
79.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro
83.1
ARC-AGI
Grok 4 leads by +25.7
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
Grok 4
66.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro
41.0
ARC-AGI-2
Grok 4 leads by +11.1
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
Grok 4
16.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro
4.9
Balrog
Grok 4 leads by +0.3
Balrog · benchmarks AI agents on text-based adventure games, testing language understanding, strategic planning, and long-horizon reasoning.
Grok 4
43.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro
43.3
Chess Puzzles
Grok 4 leads by +8.0
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
Grok 4
28.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro
20.0
DeepResearch Bench
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +1.8
DeepResearch Bench · evaluates AI on complex multi-step research tasks requiring information gathering, synthesis, and producing comprehensive analyses.
Grok 4
47.9
Gemini 2.5 Pro
49.7
Fiction.LiveBench
Grok 4 leads by +2.7
Fiction.LiveBench · a continuously updated benchmark using recently published fiction to test reading comprehension and reasoning, preventing data contamination.
Grok 4
94.4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
91.7
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
Grok 4 leads by +5.5
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
Grok 4
19.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro
14.1
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +2.1
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
Grok 4
2.1
Gemini 2.5 Pro
4.2
GeoBench
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +36.0
GeoBench · tests geographic knowledge and spatial reasoning across countries, landmarks, coordinates, and geopolitical understanding.
Grok 4
45.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro
81.0
GPQA diamond
Grok 4 leads by +2.3
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Grok 4
82.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro
80.4
HELM · GPQA
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +2.3
Grok 4
72.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro
74.9
HELM · IFEval
Grok 4 leads by +10.9
Grok 4
94.9
Gemini 2.5 Pro
84.0
HELM · MMLU-Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +1.2
Grok 4
85.1
Gemini 2.5 Pro
86.3
HELM · Omni-MATH
Grok 4 leads by +18.7
Grok 4
60.3
Gemini 2.5 Pro
41.6
HELM · WildBench
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +6.0
Grok 4
79.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro
85.7
Lech Mazur Writing
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +5.3
Lech Mazur Writing · evaluates creative writing ability, assessing prose quality, narrative coherence, and stylistic sophistication.
Grok 4
80.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro
86.0
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +0.7
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Grok 4
84.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro
84.7
SimpleBench
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +2.3
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
Grok 4
52.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro
54.9
SimpleQA Verified
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +8.1
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
Grok 4
47.9
Gemini 2.5 Pro
56.0
Terminal Bench
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +5.4
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence.
Grok 4
27.2
Gemini 2.5 Pro
32.6
WeirdML
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by +8.3
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
Grok 4
45.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro
54.0
Full benchmark table
BenchmarkGrok 4Gemini 2.5 Pro
Aider polyglot
Aider Polyglot · measures how well AI models can edit code across multiple programming languages using the Aider coding assistant framework.
79.683.1
ARC-AGI
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
66.741.0
ARC-AGI-2
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
16.04.9
Balrog
Balrog · benchmarks AI agents on text-based adventure games, testing language understanding, strategic planning, and long-horizon reasoning.
43.643.3
Chess Puzzles
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
28.020.0
DeepResearch Bench
DeepResearch Bench · evaluates AI on complex multi-step research tasks requiring information gathering, synthesis, and producing comprehensive analyses.
47.949.7
Fiction.LiveBench
Fiction.LiveBench · a continuously updated benchmark using recently published fiction to test reading comprehension and reasoning, preventing data contamination.
94.491.7
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
19.714.1
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
2.14.2
GeoBench
GeoBench · tests geographic knowledge and spatial reasoning across countries, landmarks, coordinates, and geopolitical understanding.
45.081.0
GPQA diamond
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
82.780.4
HELM · GPQA
72.674.9
HELM · IFEval
94.984.0
HELM · MMLU-Pro
85.186.3
HELM · Omni-MATH
60.341.6
HELM · WildBench
79.785.7
Lech Mazur Writing
Lech Mazur Writing · evaluates creative writing ability, assessing prose quality, narrative coherence, and stylistic sophistication.
80.786.0
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
84.084.7
SimpleBench
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
52.654.9
SimpleQA Verified
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
47.956.0
Terminal Bench
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence.
27.232.6
WeirdML
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
45.754.0
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
ModelInputOutputContextProjected $/mo
xAI logoGrok 4$3.00$15.00256K tokens (~128 books)$60.00
Google DeepMind logoGemini 2.5 Pro$1.25$10.001.0M tokens (~524 books)$34.38