Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Llama 3.2 90B vs Qwen2.5-Max
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Qwen2.5-Max wins on 3/3 benchmarks
Qwen2.5-Max wins 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Leads in knowledge · math.
Category leads
knowledge·Qwen2.5-Maxmath·Qwen2.5-Max
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Llama 3.2 90B
#164 by perf·no signal
Qwen2.5-Max
#141 by perf·no signal
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Meta AI
$1.50T·Tier 1
Alibaba (Qwen)
$293.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
3 benchmarks · 2 models
Llama 3.2 90BQwen2.5-Max
GPQA diamond
Qwen2.5-Max leads by +20.1
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Llama 3.2 90B
21.4
Qwen2.5-Max
41.5
MATH level 5
Qwen2.5-Max leads by +27.7
MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics.
Llama 3.2 90B
39.4
Qwen2.5-Max
67.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Qwen2.5-Max leads by +13.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Llama 3.2 90B
2.5
Qwen2.5-Max
16.0
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 21.4 | 41.5 |
MATH level 5 MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics. | 39.4 | 67.2 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 2.5 | 16.0 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | — |