Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
DeepSeek V4 Flash wins on 3/3 benchmarks
DeepSeek V4 Flash wins 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed.
Category leads
speed·DeepSeek V4 Flash
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Llama 4 Maverick
#230 by perf·no signal
DeepSeek V4 Flash
#31 by perf·no signal
Best value
DeepSeek V4 Flash
7.1x better value than Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick
74.7 pts/$
$0.38/M
DeepSeek V4 Flash
533.3 pts/$
$0.13/M
Vendor risk
Mixed exposure
One or more vendors flagged
Meta AI
$1.50T·Tier 1
DeepSeek
$3.4B·Tier 1
Head to head
3 benchmarks · 2 models
Llama 4 MaverickDeepSeek V4 Flash
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
DeepSeek V4 Flash leads by +29.8
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
Llama 4 Maverick
1.3
DeepSeek V4 Flash
31.1
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
DeepSeek V4 Flash leads by +39.9
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
Llama 4 Maverick
16.3
DeepSeek V4 Flash
56.2
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
DeepSeek V4 Flash leads by +26.0
Llama 4 Maverick
14.3
DeepSeek V4 Flash
40.3
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | DeepSeek V4 Flash |
|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?" | 1.3 | 31.1 |
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads. | 16.3 | 56.2 |
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 14.3 | 40.3 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.15 | $0.60 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $2.62 | |
| $0.08 | $0.17 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $1.05 |
People also compared