Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Qwen3.7 Max vs Claude Opus 4.7
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Qwen3.7 Max wins on 4/7 benchmarks
Qwen3.7 Max wins 4 of 7 shared benchmarks. Leads in knowledge · reasoning.
Category leads
knowledge·Qwen3.7 Maxmath·Claude Opus 4.7reasoning·Qwen3.7 Max
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Qwen3.7 Max
#28 by perf·no signal
Claude Opus 4.7
#65 by perf·no signal
Best value
Qwen3.7 Max
7.0x better value than Claude Opus 4.7
Qwen3.7 Max
27.2 pts/$
$2.50/M
Claude Opus 4.7
3.9 pts/$
$15.00/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Alibaba (Qwen)
$293.0B·Tier 1
Anthropic
$380.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
7 benchmarks · 2 models
Qwen3.7 MaxClaude Opus 4.7
Chess Puzzles
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +8.0
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
Qwen3.7 Max
22.0
Claude Opus 4.7
30.0
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
Qwen3.7 Max leads by +2.4
Qwen3.7 Max
34.1
Claude Opus 4.7
31.7
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +5.6
Qwen3.7 Max
64.6
Claude Opus 4.7
70.2
GPQA diamond
Qwen3.7 Max leads by +1.9
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Qwen3.7 Max
88.8
Claude Opus 4.7
86.9
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by +2.8
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Qwen3.7 Max
95.0
Claude Opus 4.7
97.8
SimpleBench
Qwen3.7 Max leads by +9.0
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
Qwen3.7 Max
64.5
Claude Opus 4.7
55.5
SimpleQA Verified
Qwen3.7 Max leads by +7.9
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
Qwen3.7 Max
58.5
Claude Opus 4.7
50.6
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities. | 22.0 | 30.0 |
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private | 34.1 | 31.7 |
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private | 64.6 | 70.2 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 88.8 | 86.9 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 95.0 | 97.8 |
SimpleBench SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking. | 64.5 | 55.5 |
SimpleQA Verified SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information. | 58.5 | 50.6 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1.25 | $3.75 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $18.75 | |
| $5.00 | $25.00 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $100.00 |