Compare · ModelsLive · 3 picked · head to head

GPT-5 vs GPT-5 Mini vs o4 Mini

Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.

Winner summary

GPT-5 wins 21 of 26 shared benchmarks. Leads in reasoning · knowledge · math.

Category leads
reasoning·GPT-5knowledge·GPT-5math·GPT-5coding·GPT-5language·o4 Mini
Hype vs Reality
GPT-5
#74 by perf·no signal
QUIET
GPT-5 Mini
#65 by perf·no signal
QUIET
o4 Mini
#81 by perf·#13 by attention
DESERVED
Best value
2.6x better value than o4 Mini
GPT-5
9.7 pts/$
$5.63/M
GPT-5 Mini
49.8 pts/$
$1.13/M
o4 Mini
19.3 pts/$
$2.75/M
Vendor risk
OpenAI logo
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
OpenAI logo
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
OpenAI logo
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
Head to head
GPT-5GPT-5 Minio4 Mini
ARC-AGI
GPT-5 leads by +7.0
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
GPT-5
65.7
GPT-5 Mini
54.3
o4 Mini
58.7
ARC-AGI-2
GPT-5 leads by +3.7
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
GPT-5
9.9
GPT-5 Mini
4.4
o4 Mini
6.1
Fiction.LiveBench
GPT-5 leads by +19.4
Fiction.LiveBench · a continuously updated benchmark using recently published fiction to test reading comprehension and reasoning, preventing data contamination.
GPT-5
97.2
GPT-5 Mini
69.4
o4 Mini
77.8
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
GPT-5 leads by +5.2
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
GPT-5
32.4
GPT-5 Mini
27.2
o4 Mini
24.8
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
GPT-5 leads by +6.3
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
GPT-5
12.5
GPT-5 Mini
6.3
o4 Mini
6.3
GPQA diamond
GPT-5 leads by +8.8
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
GPT-5
81.6
GPT-5 Mini
66.7
o4 Mini
72.8
HLE
GPT-5 leads by +6.2
HLE (Humanity's Last Exam) · a reasoning benchmark designed to be the hardest public evaluation of AI. Questions span mathematics, physics, philosophy, and logic · curated to be at or beyond the frontier of human expert capability. Tested with and without tool augmentation. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 46.9% without tools and 54.7% with tools · making it one of the few benchmarks where the top score is below 60%.
GPT-5
21.6
GPT-5 Mini
15.4
o4 Mini
13.9
MATH level 5
GPT-5 leads by +0.3
MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics.
GPT-5
98.1
GPT-5 Mini
97.8
o4 Mini
97.8
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
GPT-5 leads by +4.7
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
GPT-5
91.4
GPT-5 Mini
86.7
o4 Mini
81.7
SimpleQA Verified
GPT-5 leads by +26.7
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
GPT-5
50.6
GPT-5 Mini
21.0
o4 Mini
23.9
SWE-Bench Verified (Bash Only)
GPT-5 leads by +5.2
SWE-Bench Verified (Bash Only) · a curated subset of SWE-bench where models fix real Python repository bugs using only bash commands, no agent frameworks.
GPT-5
65.0
GPT-5 Mini
59.8
o4 Mini
45.0
VPCT
GPT-5 leads by +12.8
VPCT (Visual Pattern Completion Test) · tests visual reasoning and pattern recognition by having models complete visual sequences and transformations.
GPT-5
49.0
GPT-5 Mini
10.3
o4 Mini
36.3
WeirdML
GPT-5 leads by +8.0
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
GPT-5
60.7
GPT-5 Mini
52.7
o4 Mini
52.6
Aider polyglot
GPT-5 leads by +16.0
Aider Polyglot · measures how well AI models can edit code across multiple programming languages using the Aider coding assistant framework.
GPT-5
88.0
o4 Mini
72.0
Chess Puzzles
GPT-5 leads by +11.0
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
GPT-5
37.0
o4 Mini
26.0
GeoBench
GPT-5 leads by +17.0
GeoBench · tests geographic knowledge and spatial reasoning across countries, landmarks, coordinates, and geopolitical understanding.
GPT-5
81.0
o4 Mini
64.0
GSO-Bench
GPT-5 leads by +3.3
GSO-Bench · evaluates AI models on real-world open-source software engineering tasks, testing the ability to understand and resolve actual GitHub issues.
GPT-5
6.9
o4 Mini
3.6
HELM · GPQA
GPT-5 Mini leads by +2.1
GPT-5 Mini
75.6
o4 Mini
73.5
HELM · IFEval
o4 Mini leads by +0.2
GPT-5 Mini
92.7
o4 Mini
92.9
HELM · MMLU-Pro
GPT-5 Mini leads by +1.5
GPT-5 Mini
83.5
o4 Mini
82.0
HELM · Omni-MATH
GPT-5 Mini leads by +0.2
GPT-5 Mini
72.2
o4 Mini
72.0
HELM · WildBench
GPT-5 Mini leads by +0.1
GPT-5 Mini
85.5
o4 Mini
85.4
Lech Mazur Writing
GPT-5 leads by +12.2
Lech Mazur Writing · evaluates creative writing ability, assessing prose quality, narrative coherence, and stylistic sophistication.
GPT-5
87.2
o4 Mini
75.0
SimpleBench
GPT-5 leads by +21.6
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
GPT-5
48.0
o4 Mini
26.4
SWE-Bench verified
GPT-5 leads by +8.9
SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. Claude Mythos Preview leads at 93.9%, crossing 90% for the first time in 2026. Opus 4.6 scores 80.8%. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability.
GPT-5
73.5
GPT-5 Mini
64.7
Terminal Bench
GPT-5 leads by +14.8
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence.
GPT-5
49.6
GPT-5 Mini
34.8
Full benchmark table
BenchmarkGPT-5GPT-5 Minio4 Mini
ARC-AGI
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
65.754.358.7
ARC-AGI-2
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
9.94.46.1
Fiction.LiveBench
Fiction.LiveBench · a continuously updated benchmark using recently published fiction to test reading comprehension and reasoning, preventing data contamination.
97.269.477.8
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
32.427.224.8
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
12.56.36.3
GPQA diamond
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
81.666.772.8
HLE
HLE (Humanity's Last Exam) · a reasoning benchmark designed to be the hardest public evaluation of AI. Questions span mathematics, physics, philosophy, and logic · curated to be at or beyond the frontier of human expert capability. Tested with and without tool augmentation. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 46.9% without tools and 54.7% with tools · making it one of the few benchmarks where the top score is below 60%.
21.615.413.9
MATH level 5
MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics.
98.197.897.8
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
91.486.781.7
SimpleQA Verified
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
50.621.023.9
SWE-Bench Verified (Bash Only)
SWE-Bench Verified (Bash Only) · a curated subset of SWE-bench where models fix real Python repository bugs using only bash commands, no agent frameworks.
65.059.845.0
VPCT
VPCT (Visual Pattern Completion Test) · tests visual reasoning and pattern recognition by having models complete visual sequences and transformations.
49.010.336.3
WeirdML
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
60.752.752.6
Aider polyglot
Aider Polyglot · measures how well AI models can edit code across multiple programming languages using the Aider coding assistant framework.
88.072.0
Chess Puzzles
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
37.026.0
GeoBench
GeoBench · tests geographic knowledge and spatial reasoning across countries, landmarks, coordinates, and geopolitical understanding.
81.064.0
GSO-Bench
GSO-Bench · evaluates AI models on real-world open-source software engineering tasks, testing the ability to understand and resolve actual GitHub issues.
6.93.6
HELM · GPQA
75.673.5
HELM · IFEval
92.792.9
HELM · MMLU-Pro
83.582.0
HELM · Omni-MATH
72.272.0
HELM · WildBench
85.585.4
Lech Mazur Writing
Lech Mazur Writing · evaluates creative writing ability, assessing prose quality, narrative coherence, and stylistic sophistication.
87.275.0
SimpleBench
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
48.026.4
SWE-Bench verified
SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. Claude Mythos Preview leads at 93.9%, crossing 90% for the first time in 2026. Opus 4.6 scores 80.8%. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability.
73.564.7
Terminal Bench
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.4%, demonstrating significant agentic terminal competence.
49.634.8
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
ModelInputOutputContextProjected $/mo
OpenAI logoGPT-5$1.25$10.00400K tokens (~200 books)$34.38
OpenAI logoGPT-5 Mini$0.25$2.00400K tokens (~200 books)$6.88
OpenAI logoo4 Mini$1.10$4.40200K tokens (~100 books)$19.25