Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Kimi K2.7 Code wins on 11/17 benchmarks
Kimi K2.7 Code wins 11 of 17 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed · coding · math.
Category leads
speed·Kimi K2.7 Codeknowledge·Qwen3.7 Pluscoding·Kimi K2.7 Codemath·Kimi K2.7 Code
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Kimi K2.7 Code
#69 by perf·#17 by attention
Qwen3.7 Plus
#183 by perf·#2 by attention
Best value
Qwen3.7 Plus
1.7x better value than Kimi K2.7 Code
Kimi K2.7 Code
30.5 pts/$
$1.84/M
Qwen3.7 Plus
51.5 pts/$
$0.80/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Moonshot AI
$18.0B·Tier 1
Alibaba (Qwen)
$293.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
17 benchmarks · 2 models
Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.7 Plus
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
Kimi K2.7 Code leads by +8.8
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
Kimi K2.7 Code
29.6
Qwen3.7 Plus
20.8
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
Kimi K2.7 Code leads by +4.9
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
Kimi K2.7 Code
60.8
Qwen3.7 Plus
55.9
Artificial Analysis · CritPt
Kimi K2.7 Code leads by +0.9
Kimi K2.7 Code
10.0
Qwen3.7 Plus
9.1
Artificial Analysis · GDPval
Kimi K2.7 Code leads by +13.5
Kimi K2.7 Code
26.3
Qwen3.7 Plus
12.8
Artificial Analysis · GPQA Diamond
Qwen3.7 Plus leads by +0.4
Kimi K2.7 Code
89.6
Qwen3.7 Plus
90.0
Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam
Qwen3.7 Plus leads by +0.6
Kimi K2.7 Code
35.0
Qwen3.7 Plus
35.6
Artificial Analysis · IFBench
Qwen3.7 Plus leads by +14.9
Kimi K2.7 Code
63.1
Qwen3.7 Plus
78.0
Artificial Analysis · Long Context Reasoning
Kimi K2.7 Code leads by +6.3
Kimi K2.7 Code
79.3
Qwen3.7 Plus
73.0
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
Kimi K2.7 Code leads by +0.6
Kimi K2.7 Code
25.8
Qwen3.7 Plus
25.2
Artificial Analysis · SciCode
Kimi K2.7 Code leads by +1.7
Kimi K2.7 Code
47.8
Qwen3.7 Plus
46.1
Artificial Analysis · tau2-Bench Telecom
Qwen3.7 Plus leads by +2.9
Kimi K2.7 Code
90.1
Qwen3.7 Plus
93.0
Artificial Analysis · Terminal-Bench Hard
Qwen3.7 Plus leads by +2.3
Kimi K2.7 Code
44.7
Qwen3.7 Plus
47.0
Chess Puzzles
Qwen3.7 Plus leads by +3.2
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
Kimi K2.7 Code
16.9
Qwen3.7 Plus
20.0
Frontiercode
Kimi K2.7 Code leads by +19.9
Kimi K2.7 Code
30.1
Qwen3.7 Plus
10.2
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
Kimi K2.7 Code leads by +19.6
Kimi K2.7 Code
54.0
Qwen3.7 Plus
34.4
GPQA diamond
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Kimi K2.7 Code
83.8
Qwen3.7 Plus
83.8
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Kimi K2.7 Code leads by +2.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Kimi K2.7 Code
95.5
Qwen3.7 Plus
93.3
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?" | 29.6 | 20.8 |
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads. | 60.8 | 55.9 |
Artificial Analysis · CritPt | 10.0 | 9.1 |
Artificial Analysis · GDPval | 26.3 | 12.8 |
Artificial Analysis · GPQA Diamond | 89.6 | 90.0 |
Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam | 35.0 | 35.6 |
Artificial Analysis · IFBench | 63.1 | 78.0 |
Artificial Analysis · Long Context Reasoning | 79.3 | 73.0 |
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 25.8 | 25.2 |
Artificial Analysis · SciCode | 47.8 | 46.1 |
Artificial Analysis · tau2-Bench Telecom | 90.1 | 93.0 |
Artificial Analysis · Terminal-Bench Hard | 44.7 | 47.0 |
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities. | 16.9 | 20.0 |
Frontiercode | 30.1 | 10.2 |
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private | 54.0 | 34.4 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 83.8 | 83.8 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 95.5 | 93.3 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.61 | $3.07 | 262K tokens (~131 books) | $12.26 | |
| $0.32 | $1.28 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $5.60 |