Compare · ModelsLive · 3 picked · head to head
Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Claude Fable 5 wins on 25/30 benchmarks
Claude Fable 5 wins 25 of 30 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed · reasoning · knowledge.
Category leads
speed·Claude Fable 5agentic·Gemini 3.8 Flashreasoning·Claude Fable 5knowledge·Claude Fable 5general·Claude Fable 5math·Claude Fable 5coding·Claude Fable 5arena·Claude Fable 5
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Claude Fable 5
#30 by perf·#5 by attention
Gemini 3.8 Flash
#56 by perf·#10 by attention
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
#136 by perf·#10 by attention
Best value
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
1.2x better value than Gemini 3.8 Flash
Claude Fable 5
2.3 pts/$
$30.00/M
Gemini 3.8 Flash
23.9 pts/$
$2.48/M
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
28.5 pts/$
$1.75/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Anthropic
$965.0B·Tier 1
Google DeepMind
$3.61T·Tier 1
Google DeepMind
$3.61T·Tier 1
Head to head
30 benchmarks · 3 models
Claude Fable 5Gemini 3.8 FlashGemini 3 Flash Preview
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
Claude Fable 5 leads by +13.4
Claude Fable 5
59.9
Gemini 3.8 Flash
40.9
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
46.4
APEX-Agents
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads by +0.7
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
Claude Fable 5
63.6
Gemini 3.8 Flash
64.3
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
24.0
ARC-AGI
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
Claude Fable 5
98.5
Gemini 3.8 Flash
98.5
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
84.7
ARC-AGI-2
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
Claude Fable 5
89.2
Gemini 3.8 Flash
89.2
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
33.6
Chess Puzzles
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads by +11.6
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
Claude Fable 5
44.2
Gemini 3.8 Flash
55.8
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
38.0
Dtbench
Claude Fable 5 leads by +4.5
Claude Fable 5
97.3
Gemini 3.8 Flash
92.9
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
81.8
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
Claude Fable 5 leads by +68.3
Claude Fable 5
90.2
Gemini 3.8 Flash
21.9
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
17.1
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
Claude Fable 5 leads by +19.6
Claude Fable 5
91.6
Gemini 3.8 Flash
72.0
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
53.9
GeoBench
Claude Fable 5 leads by +1.0
GeoBench · tests geographic knowledge and spatial reasoning across countries, landmarks, coordinates, and geopolitical understanding.
Claude Fable 5
89.0
Gemini 3.8 Flash
86.0
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
88.0
GPQA diamond
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads by +8.3
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Claude Fable 5
84.5
Gemini 3.8 Flash
97.8
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
89.4
Lmca
Claude Fable 5 leads by +9.7
Claude Fable 5
71.9
Gemini 3.8 Flash
62.2
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
50.7
Mystery Game Puzzles
Claude Fable 5 leads by +5.5
Claude Fable 5
47.1
Gemini 3.8 Flash
41.6
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
18.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Claude Fable 5 leads by +1.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Claude Fable 5
100.0
Gemini 3.8 Flash
98.9
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
92.8
Proofbench
Claude Fable 5 leads by +47.0
Claude Fable 5
95.0
Gemini 3.8 Flash
48.0
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
15.0
SimpleBench
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads by +0.6
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
Claude Fable 5
78.3
Gemini 3.8 Flash
78.9
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
53.3
SimpleQA Verified
Claude Fable 5 leads by +1.0
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
Claude Fable 5
70.7
Gemini 3.8 Flash
69.7
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
67.4
WeirdML
Claude Fable 5 leads by +7.1
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
Claude Fable 5
91.9
Gemini 3.8 Flash
84.8
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
61.6
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
Claude Fable 5 leads by +3.2
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
Claude Fable 5
52.8
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
49.7
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
Claude Fable 5 leads by +33.9
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
Claude Fable 5
76.5
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
42.6
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
Claude Fable 5 leads by +215.1
Claude Fable 5
1653.9
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
1438.9
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
Claude Fable 5 leads by +34.9
Claude Fable 5
1507.6
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
1472.7
Deepswe
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads by +3.9
Claude Fable 5
69.9
Gemini 3.8 Flash
73.8
Frontiercode
Claude Fable 5 leads by +12.3
Claude Fable 5
53.5
Gemini 3.8 Flash
41.2
Frontierswe
Claude Fable 5 leads by +27.3
Claude Fable 5
47.0
Gemini 3.8 Flash
19.6
Furniture Assembly
Claude Fable 5 leads by +6.0
Claude Fable 5
8.3
Gemini 3.8 Flash
2.4
GSO-Bench
Claude Fable 5 leads by +68.6
GSO-Bench · evaluates AI models on real-world open-source software engineering tasks, testing the ability to understand and resolve actual GitHub issues.
Claude Fable 5
78.4
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
9.8
Mirrorcode
Claude Fable 5 leads by +31.1
Claude Fable 5
70.0
Gemini 3.8 Flash
38.9
Remote Labor Index
Claude Fable 5 leads by +10.3
Claude Fable 5
16.1
Gemini 3.8 Flash
5.8
Surface Evolver Bench
Claude Fable 5 leads by +18.1
Claude Fable 5
95.0
Gemini 3.8 Flash
76.9
WeirdML v3
Claude Fable 5 leads by +14.8
Claude Fable 5
31.0
Gemini 3.8 Flash
16.2
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 59.9 | 40.9 | 46.4 |
APEX-Agents APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments. | 63.6 | 64.3 | 24.0 |
ARC-AGI ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization. | 98.5 | 98.5 | 84.7 |
ARC-AGI-2 ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data. | 89.2 | 89.2 | 33.6 |
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities. | 44.2 | 55.8 | 38.0 |
Dtbench | 97.3 | 92.9 | 81.8 |
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private | 90.2 | 21.9 | 17.1 |
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private | 91.6 | 72.0 | 53.9 |
GeoBench GeoBench · tests geographic knowledge and spatial reasoning across countries, landmarks, coordinates, and geopolitical understanding. | 89.0 | 86.0 | 88.0 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 84.5 | 97.8 | 89.4 |
Lmca | 71.9 | 62.2 | 50.7 |
Mystery Game Puzzles | 47.1 | 41.6 | 18.5 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 100.0 | 98.9 | 92.8 |
Proofbench | 95.0 | 48.0 | 15.0 |
SimpleBench SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking. | 78.3 | 78.9 | 53.3 |
SimpleQA Verified SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information. | 70.7 | 69.7 | 67.4 |
WeirdML WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns. | 91.9 | 84.8 | 61.6 |
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?" | 52.8 | n/a | 49.7 |
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads. | 76.5 | n/a | 42.6 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding | 1653.9 | n/a | 1438.9 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall | 1507.6 | n/a | 1472.7 |
Deepswe | 69.9 | 73.8 | n/a |
Frontiercode | 53.5 | 41.2 | n/a |
Frontierswe | 47.0 | 19.6 | n/a |
Furniture Assembly | 8.3 | 2.4 | n/a |
GSO-Bench GSO-Bench · evaluates AI models on real-world open-source software engineering tasks, testing the ability to understand and resolve actual GitHub issues. | 78.4 | n/a | 9.8 |
Mirrorcode | 70.0 | 38.9 | n/a |
Remote Labor Index | 16.1 | 5.8 | n/a |
Surface Evolver Bench | 95.0 | 76.9 | n/a |
WeirdML v3 | 31.0 | 16.2 | n/a |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $10.00 | $50.00 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $200.00 | |
| $0.82 | $4.13 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $16.50 | |
| $0.50 | $3.00 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $11.25 |