Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM 5.2
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Claude Haiku 5.5 wins on 13/16 benchmarks
Claude Haiku 5.5 wins 13 of 16 shared benchmarks. Leads in agentic · reasoning · general.
Category leads
speed·GLM 5.2agentic·Claude Haiku 5.5reasoning·Claude Haiku 5.5knowledge·GLM 5.2general·Claude Haiku 5.5coding·Claude Haiku 5.5math·Claude Haiku 5.5
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Claude Haiku 5.5
#68 by perf·#17 by attention
GLM 5.2
#75 by perf·#3 by attention
Best value
Claude Haiku 5.5
11.6x better value than GLM 5.2
Claude Haiku 5.5
192.0 pts/$
$0.30/M
GLM 5.2
16.5 pts/$
$3.40/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Anthropic
$965.0B·Tier 1
z-ai
private · undisclosed
Head to head
16 benchmarks · 2 models
Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.2
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
GLM 5.2 leads by +7.7
Claude Haiku 5.5
43.4
GLM 5.2
51.1
APEX-Agents
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads by +10.9
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
Claude Haiku 5.5
56.1
GLM 5.2
45.2
ARC-AGI
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads by +12.0
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
Claude Haiku 5.5
89.0
GLM 5.2
77.0
ARC-AGI-2
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads by +38.5
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
Claude Haiku 5.5
61.3
GLM 5.2
22.8
Chess Puzzles
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads by +34.7
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
Claude Haiku 5.5
52.6
GLM 5.2
17.9
Dtbench
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads by +2.3
Claude Haiku 5.5
91.7
GLM 5.2
89.3
Ebr Bench
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads by +34.3
Claude Haiku 5.5
43.8
GLM 5.2
9.5
Frontiercode
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads by +21.9
Claude Haiku 5.5
46.4
GLM 5.2
24.5
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads by +17.1
Claude Haiku 5.5
46.3
GLM 5.2
29.3
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads by +16.7
Claude Haiku 5.5
79.0
GLM 5.2
62.3
GPQA diamond
GLM 5.2 leads by +3.1
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Claude Haiku 5.5
89.8
GLM 5.2
92.9
Lmca
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads by +6.2
Claude Haiku 5.5
60.1
GLM 5.2
53.9
Mystery Game Puzzles
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads by +12.1
Claude Haiku 5.5
22.9
GLM 5.2
10.8
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads by +12.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Claude Haiku 5.5
98.9
GLM 5.2
86.4
Proofbench
Claude Haiku 5.5 leads by +54.0
Claude Haiku 5.5
89.0
GLM 5.2
35.0
SimpleQA Verified
GLM 5.2 leads by +10.4
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
Claude Haiku 5.5
23.8
GLM 5.2
34.2
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | GLM 5.2 |
|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 43.4 | 51.1 |
APEX-Agents APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments. | 56.1 | 45.2 |
ARC-AGI ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization. | 89.0 | 77.0 |
ARC-AGI-2 ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data. | 61.3 | 22.8 |
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities. | 52.6 | 17.9 |
Dtbench | 91.7 | 89.3 |
Ebr Bench | 43.8 | 9.5 |
Frontiercode | 46.4 | 24.5 |
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private | 46.3 | 29.3 |
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private | 79.0 | 62.3 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 89.8 | 92.9 |
Lmca | 60.1 | 53.9 |
Mystery Game Puzzles | 22.9 | 10.8 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 98.9 | 86.4 |
Proofbench | 89.0 | 35.0 |
SimpleQA Verified SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information. | 23.8 | 34.2 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.10 | $0.50 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $2.00 | |
| $0.01 | $6.80 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $17.05 |