Compare · ModelsLive · 3 picked · head to head

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5

Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.

Winner summary

Claude Opus 4.6 wins 32 of 35 shared benchmarks. Leads in agentic · reasoning · knowledge.

Category leads
agentic·Claude Opus 4.6reasoning·Claude Opus 4.6knowledge·Claude Opus 4.6general·Claude Opus 4.6math·Claude Opus 4.6coding·Claude Opus 4.6arena·Claude Opus 4.6
Hype vs Reality
Claude Opus 4.6
#154 by perf·#6 by attention
DESERVED
Claude Sonnet 4.6
#163 by perf·#11 by attention
UNDERRATED
GPT-5
#115 by perf·#9 by attention
DESERVED
Best value
1.8x better value than Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
3.2 pts/$
$15.00/M
Claude Sonnet 4.6
5.2 pts/$
$9.00/M
GPT-5
9.3 pts/$
$5.63/M
Vendor risk
Anthropic logo
Anthropic
$965.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
Anthropic logo
Anthropic
$965.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
OpenAI logo
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
Head to head
Claude Opus 4.6Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5
APEX-Agents
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +3.3
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
Claude Opus 4.6
46.3
Claude Sonnet 4.6
43.0
GPT-5
18.3
ARC-AGI
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +7.5
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
Claude Opus 4.6
94.0
Claude Sonnet 4.6
86.5
GPT-5
65.7
ARC-AGI-2
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +8.8
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
Claude Opus 4.6
69.2
Claude Sonnet 4.6
60.4
GPT-5
9.9
Chess Puzzles
GPT-5 leads by +20.0
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
Claude Opus 4.6
17.0
Claude Sonnet 4.6
13.0
GPT-5
37.0
DeepResearch Bench
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +0.2
DeepResearch Bench · evaluates AI on complex multi-step research tasks requiring information gathering, synthesis, and producing comprehensive analyses.
Claude Opus 4.6
55.3
Claude Sonnet 4.6
54.9
GPT-5
55.1
Dtbench
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +0.9
Claude Opus 4.6
85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.6
83.1
GPT-5
84.5
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +8.3
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
Claude Opus 4.6
40.7
Claude Sonnet 4.6
32.4
GPT-5
32.4
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +9.1
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
Claude Opus 4.6
22.9
Claude Sonnet 4.6
13.8
GPT-5
12.5
GPQA diamond
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +4.4
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Claude Opus 4.6
91.0
Claude Sonnet 4.6
86.6
GPT-5
85.0
Lmca
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +10.9
Claude Opus 4.6
65.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6
54.7
GPT-5
47.0
Mystery Game Puzzles
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +2.2
Claude Opus 4.6
17.4
Claude Sonnet 4.6
7.5
GPT-5
15.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +3.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Claude Opus 4.6
94.4
Claude Sonnet 4.6
85.8
GPT-5
91.4
Proofbench
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +5.0
Claude Opus 4.6
50.0
Claude Sonnet 4.6
45.0
GPT-5
18.0
SimpleQA Verified
GPT-5 leads by +4.1
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
Claude Opus 4.6
46.5
Claude Sonnet 4.6
35.5
GPT-5
50.6
SWE-Bench verified
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +3.5
SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability.
Claude Opus 4.6
78.7
Claude Sonnet 4.6
75.2
GPT-5
73.5
Terminal Bench
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +26.4
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency.
Claude Opus 4.6
79.8
Claude Sonnet 4.6
53.4
GPT-5
49.6
WeirdML
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +11.8
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
Claude Opus 4.6
77.9
Claude Sonnet 4.6
66.1
GPT-5
60.7
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +15.6
Claude Opus 4.6
1537.0
Claude Sonnet 4.6
1521.4
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +25.1
Claude Opus 4.6
1497.3
Claude Sonnet 4.6
1472.2
Ebr Bench
Claude Opus 4.6
12.7
GPT-5
12.7
Frontiercode
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +2.3
Claude Opus 4.6
26.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6
24.3
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +4.9
Claude Opus 4.6
26.8
GPT-5
21.9
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +11.1
Claude Opus 4.6
69.4
GPT-5
58.4
GeoBench
GPT-5 leads by +8.0
GeoBench · tests geographic knowledge and spatial reasoning across countries, landmarks, coordinates, and geopolitical understanding.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
73.0
GPT-5
81.0
GSO-Bench
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +26.4
GSO-Bench · evaluates AI models on real-world open-source software engineering tasks, testing the ability to understand and resolve actual GitHub issues.
Claude Opus 4.6
33.3
GPT-5
6.9
HLE
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +9.6
HLE (Humanity's Last Exam) · a reasoning benchmark designed to be the hardest public evaluation of AI. Questions span mathematics, physics, philosophy, and logic · curated to be at or beyond the frontier of human expert capability. Tested with and without tool augmentation.
Claude Opus 4.6
31.1
GPT-5
21.6
Metr Time Horizons
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +9.3
Claude Opus 4.6
78.9
GPT-5
69.6
Mirrorcode
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +28.9
Claude Opus 4.6
33.3
GPT-5
4.4
PostTrainBench
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +6.7
Claude Opus 4.6
23.2
Claude Sonnet 4.6
16.4
Remote Labor Index
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +2.5
Claude Opus 4.6
4.2
GPT-5
1.7
Professional Reasoning · Finance
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +2.0
Claude Opus 4.6
53.3
GPT-5
51.3
Professional Reasoning · Legal
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +3.3
Claude Opus 4.6
52.3
GPT-5
49.0
SWE Atlas · Codebase QnA
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +2.1
Claude Opus 4.6
33.3
Claude Sonnet 4.6
31.2
SWE Atlas · Test Writing
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +4.9
Claude Opus 4.6
36.7
Claude Sonnet 4.6
31.8
SimpleBench
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by +13.1
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
Claude Opus 4.6
61.1
GPT-5
48.0
Full benchmark table
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5
APEX-Agents
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
46.343.018.3
ARC-AGI
ARC-AGI · the original Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing whether AI can solve novel visual pattern recognition tasks without memorization.
94.086.565.7
ARC-AGI-2
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
69.260.49.9
Chess Puzzles
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
17.013.037.0
DeepResearch Bench
DeepResearch Bench · evaluates AI on complex multi-step research tasks requiring information gathering, synthesis, and producing comprehensive analyses.
55.354.955.1
Dtbench
85.383.184.5
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
40.732.432.4
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
22.913.812.5
GPQA diamond
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
91.086.685.0
Lmca
65.654.747.0
Mystery Game Puzzles
17.47.515.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
94.485.891.4
Proofbench
50.045.018.0
SimpleQA Verified
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
46.535.550.6
SWE-Bench verified
SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability.
78.775.273.5
Terminal Bench
Terminal-Bench 2.0 · evaluates AI agents on real terminal-based coding tasks · writing scripts, debugging, running tests, and managing projects entirely through command-line interaction. Tests both code quality and terminal fluency.
79.853.449.6
WeirdML
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
77.966.160.7
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
1537.01521.4n/a
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
1497.31472.2n/a
Ebr Bench
12.7n/a12.7
Frontiercode
26.624.3n/a
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
26.8n/a21.9
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
69.4n/a58.4
GeoBench
GeoBench · tests geographic knowledge and spatial reasoning across countries, landmarks, coordinates, and geopolitical understanding.
n/a73.081.0
GSO-Bench
GSO-Bench · evaluates AI models on real-world open-source software engineering tasks, testing the ability to understand and resolve actual GitHub issues.
33.3n/a6.9
HLE
HLE (Humanity's Last Exam) · a reasoning benchmark designed to be the hardest public evaluation of AI. Questions span mathematics, physics, philosophy, and logic · curated to be at or beyond the frontier of human expert capability. Tested with and without tool augmentation.
31.1n/a21.6
Metr Time Horizons
78.9n/a69.6
Mirrorcode
33.3n/a4.4
PostTrainBench
23.216.4n/a
Remote Labor Index
4.2n/a1.7
Professional Reasoning · Finance
53.3n/a51.3
Professional Reasoning · Legal
52.3n/a49.0
SWE Atlas · Codebase QnA
33.331.2n/a
SWE Atlas · Test Writing
36.731.8n/a
SimpleBench
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
61.1n/a48.0
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
ModelInputOutputContextProjected $/mo
Anthropic logoClaude Opus 4.6$5.00$25.001.0M tokens (~500 books)$100.00
Anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.6$3.00$15.001.0M tokens (~500 books)$60.00
OpenAI logoGPT-5$1.25$10.00400K tokens (~200 books)$34.38