Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Claude Opus 5.5 wins on 0/0 benchmarks
Not enough overlapping benchmarks to declare a winner yet · Claude Opus 5.5 · Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 are still filling in scores.
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Claude Opus 5.5
#3 by perf·#6 by attention
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
#32 by perf·#2 by attention
Best value
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
7.4x better value than Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
6.9 pts/$
$12.00/M
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
50.9 pts/$
$1.30/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Anthropic
$965.0B·Tier 1
Alibaba (Qwen)
$293.0B·Tier 1
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $4.00 | $20.00 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $80.00 | |
| $0.20 | $2.40 | 82K tokens (~41 books) | $7.50 |
People also compared