Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Kimi K2.6
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins on 12/19 benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins 12 of 19 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed · arena · general.
Category leads
speed·Claude Sonnet 4.6arena·Claude Sonnet 4.6knowledge·Kimi K2.6general·Claude Sonnet 4.6math·Kimi K2.6coding·Kimi K2.6
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Claude Sonnet 4.6
#149 by perf·#10 by attention
Kimi K2.6
#205 by perf·#17 by attention
Best value
Kimi K2.6
3.0x better value than Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6
5.1 pts/$
$9.00/M
Kimi K2.6
15.5 pts/$
$2.48/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Anthropic
$965.0B·Tier 1
Moonshot AI
$18.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
19 benchmarks · 2 models
Claude Sonnet 4.6Kimi K2.6
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads by +10.5
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?"
Claude Sonnet 4.6
40.8
Kimi K2.6
30.3
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads by +7.0
Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
63.0
Kimi K2.6
56.0
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads by +4.4
Claude Sonnet 4.6
47.2
Kimi K2.6
42.8
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads by +12.7
Claude Sonnet 4.6
1521.4
Kimi K2.6
1508.7
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads by +11.2
Claude Sonnet 4.6
1472.2
Kimi K2.6
1461.0
Chess Puzzles
Kimi K2.6 leads by +13.7
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
8.5
Kimi K2.6
22.1
Dtbench
Kimi K2.6 leads by +1.8
Claude Sonnet 4.6
83.1
Kimi K2.6
84.9
Exploitbench
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads by +5.2
Claude Sonnet 4.6
23.6
Kimi K2.6
18.4
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads by +17.9
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
56.8
Kimi K2.6
39.0
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
Kimi K2.6 leads by +0.8
FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
13.8
Kimi K2.6
14.6
GPQA diamond
Kimi K2.6 leads by +4.5
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
83.2
Kimi K2.6
87.7
Lmca
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads by +10.9
Claude Sonnet 4.6
54.7
Kimi K2.6
43.8
Mystery Game Puzzles
Kimi K2.6 leads by +2.2
Claude Sonnet 4.6
7.5
Kimi K2.6
9.7
Osworld 2 0
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads by +4.7
Claude Sonnet 4.6
9.3
Kimi K2.6
4.6
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Kimi K2.6 leads by +10.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
85.8
Kimi K2.6
96.1
Proofbench
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads by +29.0
Claude Sonnet 4.6
45.0
Kimi K2.6
16.0
SimpleQA Verified
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads by +0.6
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
35.5
Kimi K2.6
34.9
SWE-Bench verified
Kimi K2.6 leads by +1.4
SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. Claude Mythos Preview leads at 93.9%, crossing 90% for the first time in 2026. Opus 4.6 scores 80.8%. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
75.2
Kimi K2.6
76.7
WeirdML
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads by +10.2
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
66.1
Kimi K2.6
55.9
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index Artificial Analysis Agentic Index · a composite score measuring how well a model performs in agentic workflows · multi-step tool use, planning, error recovery, and autonomous task completion. Aggregates results from multiple agentic benchmarks including SWE-bench, tool-use tests, and planning evaluations. The canonical single-number metric for "how good is this model as an agent?" | 40.8 | 30.3 |
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index Artificial Analysis Coding Index · a composite score that aggregates performance across multiple coding benchmarks into a single index. Tracks code generation quality, debugging ability, multi-language competence, and real-world software engineering tasks. Used by Artificial Analysis to rank model coding capability in a normalized, comparable format. Useful for developers choosing between models for coding-heavy workloads. | 63.0 | 56.0 |
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 47.2 | 42.8 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Coding | 1521.4 | 1508.7 |
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall | 1472.2 | 1461.0 |
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities. | 8.5 | 22.1 |
Dtbench | 83.1 | 84.9 |
Exploitbench | 23.6 | 18.4 |
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning. | 56.8 | 39.0 |
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private FrontierMath Tier 4 (Jul 2025) · the most challenging tier of frontier mathematics, containing problems that push the absolute limits of AI mathematical reasoning. | 13.8 | 14.6 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 83.2 | 87.7 |
Lmca | 54.7 | 43.8 |
Mystery Game Puzzles | 7.5 | 9.7 |
Osworld 2 0 | 9.3 | 4.6 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 85.8 | 96.1 |
Proofbench | 45.0 | 16.0 |
SimpleQA Verified SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information. | 35.5 | 34.9 |
SWE-Bench verified SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. Claude Mythos Preview leads at 93.9%, crossing 90% for the first time in 2026. Opus 4.6 scores 80.8%. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability. | 75.2 | 76.7 |
WeirdML WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns. | 66.1 | 55.9 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $3.00 | $15.00 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $60.00 | |
| $0.95 | $4.00 | 262K tokens (~131 books) | $17.13 |
People also compared