Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
DeepSeek V3.1 vs GLM 4.7
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GLM 4.7 wins on 2/2 benchmarks
GLM 4.7 wins 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Leads in arena · reasoning.
Category leads
arena·GLM 4.7reasoning·GLM 4.7
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
DeepSeek V3.1
#118 by perf·no signal
GLM 4.7
#152 by perf·#3 by attention
Best value
DeepSeek V3.1
2.6x better value than GLM 4.7
DeepSeek V3.1
84.5 pts/$
$0.60/M
GLM 4.7
32.9 pts/$
$1.40/M
Vendor risk
Mixed exposure
One or more vendors flagged
DeepSeek
$3.4B·Tier 1
z-ai
private · undisclosed
Head to head
2 benchmarks · 2 models
DeepSeek V3.1GLM 4.7
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
GLM 4.7 leads by +24.3
DeepSeek V3.1
1417.2
GLM 4.7
1441.5
SimpleBench
GLM 4.7 leads by +9.2
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
DeepSeek V3.1
28.0
GLM 4.7
37.2
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 | GLM 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall | 1417.2 | 1441.5 |
SimpleBench SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking. | 28.0 | 37.2 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.25 | $0.95 | 164K tokens (~82 books) | $4.25 | |
| $0.60 | $2.20 | 205K tokens (~102 books) | $10.00 |
People also compared