Beta
Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs MiniMax M2.7

Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.

Winner summary

MiniMax M2.7 wins 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed.

Category leads
speed·MiniMax M2.7
Hype vs Reality
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
#4 by perf·#5 by attention
DESERVED
MiniMax M2.7
#30 by perf·no signal
QUIET
Best value
1.2x better value than MiniMax M2.7
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
97.8 pts/$
$0.80/M
MiniMax M2.7
84.7 pts/$
$0.75/M
Vendor risk
One or more vendors flagged
DeepSeek logo
DeepSeek
$3.4B·Tier 1
Higher risk
minimax logo
MiniMax
$4.0B·Tier 1
Higher risk
Head to head
DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeMiniMax M2.7
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
MiniMax M2.7 leads by +61.5
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
0.0
MiniMax M2.7
61.5
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
MiniMax M2.7 leads by +4.0
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
37.9
MiniMax M2.7
41.9
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
MiniMax M2.7 leads by +20.2
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
29.4
MiniMax M2.7
49.6
Full benchmark table
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeMiniMax M2.7
Artificial Analysis · Agentic Index
0.061.5
Artificial Analysis · Coding Index
37.941.9
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
29.449.6
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
ModelInputOutputContextProjected $/mo
DeepSeek logoDeepSeek V3.2 Speciale$0.40$1.20164K tokens (~82 books)$6.00
minimax logoMiniMax M2.7$0.30$1.20197K tokens (~98 books)$5.25