Compare · ModelsLive · 3 picked · head to head

Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024) vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.

Winner summary

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) wins 11 of 24 shared benchmarks. Leads in coding · knowledge · agentic.

Category leads
coding·GPT-4o (2024-11-20)knowledge·GPT-4o (2024-11-20)math·Qwen2.5 72B Instructagentic·GPT-4o (2024-11-20)multimodal·Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)reasoning·Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)arena·Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)general·GPT-4o (2024-11-20)language·Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
Hype vs Reality
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
#196 by perf·no signal
QUIET
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
#255 by perf·no signal
QUIET
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
#142 by perf·#1 by attention
DESERVED
Best value
25.0x better value than GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
n/a
no price
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
5.2 pts/$
$6.25/M
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
129.7 pts/$
$0.38/M
Vendor risk
Google DeepMind logo
Google DeepMind
$3.61T·Tier 1
Low risk
OpenAI logo
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Medium risk
Alibaba Qwen logo
Alibaba (Qwen)
$293.0B·Tier 1
Low risk
Head to head
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)GPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Aider · Code Editing
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) leads by +6.0
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
57.1
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
71.4
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
65.4
Balrog
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) leads by +11.3
Balrog · benchmarks AI agents on text-based adventure games, testing language understanding, strategic planning, and long-horizon reasoning.
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
21.0
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
32.3
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
16.2
GPQA diamond
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads by +3.0
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
27.8
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
30.5
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
33.5
MATH level 5
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads by +13.4
MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics.
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
40.8
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
49.8
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
63.2
MMLU
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) leads by +3.7
Massive Multitask Language Understanding · 57 subjects spanning STEM, humanities, social sciences, and more. The standard benchmark for broad knowledge.
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
76.9
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
84.1
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
80.4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads by +1.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
6.7
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
6.2
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
8.0
The Agent Company
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) leads by +2.9
The Agent Company · tests AI agents on realistic corporate tasks like email management, code review, data analysis, and cross-tool workflows.
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
3.4
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
8.6
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
5.7
VideoMME
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024) leads by +2.0
VideoMME · multimodal benchmark testing video understanding across diverse domains, requiring temporal reasoning and cross-frame comprehension.
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
66.7
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
62.5
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
64.7
WeirdML
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) leads by +2.9
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
22.2
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
25.1
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
16.0
ARC-AGI-2
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024) leads by +0.8
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
0.8
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
0.0
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024) leads by +19.7
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
1322.5
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
1302.8
BBH
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024) leads by +5.6
BIG-Bench Hard · a curated subset of 23 challenging tasks from BIG-Bench where language models previously failed to outperform average humans.
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
78.7
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
73.1
CadEval
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024) leads by +8.0
CadEval · evaluates the ability to generate and reason about Computer-Aided Design code, testing spatial reasoning and engineering knowledge.
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
34.0
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
26.0
Cybench
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) leads by +5.0
Cybench · evaluates AI on real Capture-The-Flag cybersecurity challenges, testing vulnerability analysis, exploitation, and security reasoning.
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
7.5
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
12.5
Dtbench
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) leads by +2.7
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
40.9
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
38.2
GeoBench
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) leads by +9.0
GeoBench · tests geographic knowledge and spatial reasoning across countries, landmarks, coordinates, and geopolitical understanding.
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
71.0
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
62.0
HELM · GPQA
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024) leads by +1.4
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
53.4
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
52.0
HELM · IFEval
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024) leads by +2.0
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
83.7
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
81.7
HELM · MMLU-Pro
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024) leads by +2.4
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
73.7
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
71.3
HELM · Omni-MATH
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024) leads by +7.1
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
36.4
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
29.3
HELM · WildBench
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) leads by +1.5
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
81.3
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
82.8
Lmca
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) leads by +3.7
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
19.5
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
15.8
Metr Time Horizons
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) leads by +5.0
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
40.8
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
35.8
SimpleBench
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024) leads by +11.2
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)
12.5
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
1.4
Full benchmark table
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)GPT-4o (2024-11-20)Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Aider · Code Editing
57.171.465.4
Balrog
Balrog · benchmarks AI agents on text-based adventure games, testing language understanding, strategic planning, and long-horizon reasoning.
21.032.316.2
GPQA diamond
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
27.830.533.5
MATH level 5
MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics.
40.849.863.2
MMLU
Massive Multitask Language Understanding · 57 subjects spanning STEM, humanities, social sciences, and more. The standard benchmark for broad knowledge.
76.984.180.4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
6.76.28.0
The Agent Company
The Agent Company · tests AI agents on realistic corporate tasks like email management, code review, data analysis, and cross-tool workflows.
3.48.65.7
VideoMME
VideoMME · multimodal benchmark testing video understanding across diverse domains, requiring temporal reasoning and cross-frame comprehension.
66.762.564.7
WeirdML
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
22.225.116.0
ARC-AGI-2
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
0.80.0n/a
Chatbot Arena Elo · Overall
1322.5n/a1302.8
BBH
BIG-Bench Hard · a curated subset of 23 challenging tasks from BIG-Bench where language models previously failed to outperform average humans.
78.7n/a73.1
CadEval
CadEval · evaluates the ability to generate and reason about Computer-Aided Design code, testing spatial reasoning and engineering knowledge.
34.026.0n/a
Cybench
Cybench · evaluates AI on real Capture-The-Flag cybersecurity challenges, testing vulnerability analysis, exploitation, and security reasoning.
7.512.5n/a
Dtbench
n/a40.938.2
GeoBench
GeoBench · tests geographic knowledge and spatial reasoning across countries, landmarks, coordinates, and geopolitical understanding.
n/a71.062.0
HELM · GPQA
53.452.0n/a
HELM · IFEval
83.781.7n/a
HELM · MMLU-Pro
73.771.3n/a
HELM · Omni-MATH
36.429.3n/a
HELM · WildBench
81.382.8n/a
Lmca
n/a19.515.8
Metr Time Horizons
n/a40.835.8
SimpleBench
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
12.51.4n/a
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
ModelInputOutputContextProjected $/mo
Google DeepMind logoGemini 1.5 Pro (Feb 2024)n/an/an/an/a
OpenAI logoGPT-4o (2024-11-20)$2.50$10.00128K tokens (~64 books)$43.75
Alibaba Qwen logoQwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.36$0.4033K tokens (~16 books)$3.70