Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Grok 3
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Grok 3 wins on 13/15 benchmarks
Grok 3 wins 13 of 15 shared benchmarks. Leads in coding · reasoning · knowledge.
Category leads
coding·Grok 3reasoning·Grok 3knowledge·Grok 3math·Grok 3language·Grok 3
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Gemini 2.0 Flash
#153 by perf·no signal
Grok 3
#171 by perf·no signal
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Google DeepMind
$3.61T·Tier 1
xAI
$250.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
15 benchmarks · 2 models
Gemini 2.0 FlashGrok 3
Aider polyglot
Grok 3 leads by +15.1
Aider Polyglot · measures how well AI models can edit code across multiple programming languages using the Aider coding assistant framework.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
38.2
Grok 3
53.3
ARC-AGI-2
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads by +1.3
ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1.3
Grok 3
0.0
Fiction.LiveBench
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads by +2.8
Fiction.LiveBench · a continuously updated benchmark using recently published fiction to test reading comprehension and reasoning, preventing data contamination.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
61.1
Grok 3
58.3
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
Grok 3 leads by +2.1
FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1.7
Grok 3
3.8
GPQA diamond
Grok 3 leads by +15.5
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
52.2
Grok 3
67.7
HELM · GPQA
Grok 3 leads by +9.4
Gemini 2.0 Flash
55.6
Grok 3
65.0
HELM · IFEval
Grok 3 leads by +4.3
Gemini 2.0 Flash
84.1
Grok 3
88.4
HELM · MMLU-Pro
Grok 3 leads by +5.1
Gemini 2.0 Flash
73.7
Grok 3
78.8
HELM · Omni-MATH
Grok 3 leads by +0.5
Gemini 2.0 Flash
45.9
Grok 3
46.4
HELM · WildBench
Grok 3 leads by +4.9
Gemini 2.0 Flash
80.0
Grok 3
84.9
Lech Mazur Writing
Grok 3 leads by +4.9
Lech Mazur Writing · evaluates creative writing ability, assessing prose quality, narrative coherence, and stylistic sophistication.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
71.5
Grok 3
76.4
MATH level 5
Grok 3 leads by +6.6
MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
82.2
Grok 3
88.8
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Grok 3 leads by +24.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
31.0
Grok 3
55.5
SimpleBench
Grok 3 leads by +6.0
SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
17.3
Grok 3
23.3
WeirdML
Grok 3 leads by +11.5
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
25.8
Grok 3
37.2
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
Aider polyglot Aider Polyglot · measures how well AI models can edit code across multiple programming languages using the Aider coding assistant framework. | 38.2 | 53.3 |
ARC-AGI-2 ARC-AGI-2 · the second iteration of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus, testing novel pattern recognition and abstract reasoning without prior training data. | 1.3 | 0.0 |
Fiction.LiveBench Fiction.LiveBench · a continuously updated benchmark using recently published fiction to test reading comprehension and reasoning, preventing data contamination. | 61.1 | 58.3 |
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private FrontierMath (Feb 2025) · original research-level math problems created by mathematicians, testing capabilities at the boundary of current AI mathematical reasoning. | 1.7 | 3.8 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 52.2 | 67.7 |
HELM · GPQA | 55.6 | 65.0 |
HELM · IFEval | 84.1 | 88.4 |
HELM · MMLU-Pro | 73.7 | 78.8 |
HELM · Omni-MATH | 45.9 | 46.4 |
HELM · WildBench | 80.0 | 84.9 |
Lech Mazur Writing Lech Mazur Writing · evaluates creative writing ability, assessing prose quality, narrative coherence, and stylistic sophistication. | 71.5 | 76.4 |
MATH level 5 MATH Level 5 · the hardest tier of the MATH benchmark, featuring competition-level problems from AMC, AIME, and Olympiad-style mathematics. | 82.2 | 88.8 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 31.0 | 55.5 |
SimpleBench SimpleBench · tests fundamental reasoning capabilities with straightforward problems designed to expose gaps in basic logical and spatial thinking. | 17.3 | 23.3 |
WeirdML WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns. | 25.8 | 37.2 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.10 | $0.40 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $1.75 | |
| n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
People also compared