Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Muse Spark
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GPT-6.1 Sol wins on 5/5 benchmarks
GPT-6.1 Sol wins 5 of 5 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed · knowledge · math.
Category leads
speed·GPT-6.1 Solknowledge·GPT-6.1 Solmath·GPT-6.1 Solgeneral·GPT-6.1 Sol
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
GPT-6.1 Sol
#7 by perf·#2 by attention
Muse Spark
#80 by perf·no signal
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
OpenAI
$840.0B·Tier 1
Meta AI
$1.65T·Tier 1
Head to head
5 benchmarks · 2 models
GPT-6.1 SolMuse Spark
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
GPT-6.1 Sol leads by +8.8
GPT-6.1 Sol
51.8
Muse Spark
43.1
GPQA diamond
GPT-6.1 Sol leads by +7.8
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
GPT-6.1 Sol
97.8
Muse Spark
90.0
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
GPT-6.1 Sol leads by +11.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
GPT-6.1 Sol
100.0
Muse Spark
88.9
Proofbench
GPT-6.1 Sol leads by +82.0
GPT-6.1 Sol
99.0
Muse Spark
17.0
SimpleQA Verified
GPT-6.1 Sol leads by +7.6
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
GPT-6.1 Sol
73.9
Muse Spark
66.3
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 51.8 | 43.1 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 97.8 | 90.0 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 100.0 | 88.9 |
Proofbench | 99.0 | 17.0 |
SimpleQA Verified SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information. | 73.9 | 66.3 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2.00 | $10.00 | 1.1M tokens (~525 books) | $40.00 | |
| n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |