Cheapest writing LLMs
Best-value models for general writing · blogs, marketing, drafts, summaries. Ranked by input token price with quality score.
Ranked by input price
General-purpose LLMs, cheapest first.
| # | Model | In $/1M | Out $/1M | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $0.01 | $0.50 | OSS | |
| 2 | $0.01 | $6.80 | OSS | |
| 3 | I Ling-2.6-flash | $0.01 | $0.03 | Closed |
| 4 | $0.01 | $0.02 | OSS | |
| 5 | $0.01 | $0.02 | OSS | |
| 6 | $0.01 | $0.20 | Closed | |
| 7 | $0.02 | $0.11 | OSS | |
| 8 | $0.02 | $0.04 | OSS | |
| 9 | $0.02 | $0.11 | Closed | |
| 10 | $0.03 | $0.10 | Closed | |
| 11 | $0.03 | $0.10 | Closed | |
| 12 | $0.03 | $0.20 | Closed | |
| 13 | $0.03 | $0.20 | OSS | |
| 14 | $0.03 | $0.03 | OSS | |
| 15 | $0.03 | $0.14 | Closed | |
| 16 | $0.03 | $0.13 | Closed | |
| 17 | $0.03 | $0.09 | OSS | |
| 18 | $0.03 | $0.13 | OSS | |
| 19 | $0.03 | $0.12 | OSS | |
| 20 | $0.03 | $0.09 | OSS | |
| 21 | $0.03 | $0.13 | OSS | |
| 22 | $0.04 | $0.14 | Closed | |
| 23 | $0.04 | $0.15 | Closed | |
| 24 | $0.04 | $0.08 | Closed | |
| 25 | $0.04 | $0.05 | OSS | |
| 26 | $0.04 | $0.15 | Closed | |
| 27 | $0.04 | $0.15 | Closed | |
| 28 | $0.04 | $0.16 | OSS | |
| 29 | $0.04 | $0.00 | Closed | |
| 30 | $0.04 | $0.30 | Closed |
Top 3 best-value writing LLMs
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 offers the strongest quality-to-price ratio for general writing tasks. At $0.01/M input, it is a safe default for drafting, rewriting, and summarization.
GLM 5.2 offers the strongest quality-to-price ratio for general writing tasks. At $0.01/M input, it is a safe default for drafting, rewriting, and summarization.
gpt-oss-20b offers the strongest quality-to-price ratio for general writing tasks. At $0.03/M input, it is a safe default for drafting, rewriting, and summarization.
The price gap · cheapest vs most expensive
The premium on writing models is almost entirely brand voice and tone. The quality gap on factual accuracy, grammar, and structure is within noise for most real-world writing jobs.